ArticleBMJ open2018
Essential fracture and orthopaedic equipment lists in low resource settings: consensus derived by survey of experts in Africa.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care: Second Edition (2026).World journal of surgery · 2026Guideline
- Availability and gaps in operating theatre structural resources for fracture fixation in Tanzania: a national cross-sectional analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Impact of fracture table availability and usability on surgical decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey of Nigerian orthopaedic surgeons.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Access to operative fracture fixation resources and implants in orthopaedic trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2026Article
- Frugal Innovations in Orthopaedics.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Trauma by the Numbers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis and Categorization of Trauma Cases in the Gaza War.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
- Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Covid-19 and orthopaedic trauma: Quantification of orthopaedic trauma workload and staff resource allocation during a global pandemic-related lockdown.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- No implant, no solution, lost cases to surgery: orthopedic trauma triage for surgery in an NGO hospital in Sierra Leone.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study of open tibia fractures in Malawi with a nested implementation of open fracture guidelines.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- The Malawi Orthopaedic Association/AO Alliance guidelines and standards for open fracture management in Malawi: a national consensus statement.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow/middle-income countries (LMICs) have a growing need for trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgical interventions but lack surgical resources. Part of this is due to the high amount of road traffic accidents in LMICs. We aimed to develop recommendations for an essential list of equipment for three different levels of care providers.
methodsThe Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on essential and desirable T&O equipment for LMICs. Twenty experts with T&O experience from LMICs underwent two rounds of questionnaires. Feedback was given after each round of questionnaires. The first round of questionnaire consisted of 45 items graded on a Likert scale with the second round consisting of 50 items. We used an electronic questionnaire to collect our data for three different levels of care: non-operative-based provider, specialist provider with operative fracture care and tertiary provider with operative fracture care and orthopaedics.
resultsAfter two rounds of questionnaires, recommendations for each level of care in LMICs included 4 essential equipment items for non-operative-based providers; 27 essential equipment items for specialist providers with operative fracture care and 46 essential equipment items for tertiary providers with operative fracture care and orthopaedic care.
conclusionThese recommendations can facilitate in planning of appropriate equipment required in an institution which in turn has the potential to improve the capacity and quality of T&O care in LMICs. The essential equipment lists provided here can help direct where funding for equipment should be targeted. Our recommendations can help with planning and organising national T&O care in LMICs to achieve appropriate capacity at all relevant levels of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.