Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224110›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2018

From the Past to the Present: Insurer Coverage Frameworks for Next-Generation Tumor Sequencing.

Julia R Trosman, Christine B Weldon, William J Gradishar, Al B Benson, Massimo Cristofanilli, Allison W Kurian, James M Ford, Alan Balch, John Watkins, Kathryn A Phillips

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Genomic Medicine: Considerations for Addressing Health Equity.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Use of Real-World Evidence in US Payer Coverage Decision-Making for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Tests: Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Solutions.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Review
  15. Insights From a Temporal Assessment of Increases in US Private Payer Coverage of Tumor Sequencing From 2015 to 2019.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia R TrosmanCenter for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL, USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: trosman@centerforbusinessmodels.com.
Christine B WeldonCenter for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL, USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
William J GradisharFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Al B BensonFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Massimo CristofanilliFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Allison W KurianStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
James M FordStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alan BalchPatient Advocate Foundation, Hampton, VA, USA.
John WatkinsPremera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA.
Kathryn A PhillipsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Risk-Benefit Trade-Offs for Whole Genome SequencingR01HG007063 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
Coverage, Price, and Reimbursement for Multigene Tests for Cancer and Related ConditionsR01CA221870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2018 to 2020
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221870NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing promises major advancements in precision medicine but faces considerable challenges with insurance coverage. These challenges are especially important to address in oncology in which next-generation tumor sequencing (NGTS) holds a particular promise, guiding the use of life-saving or life-prolonging therapies. Payers' coverage decision making on NGTS is challenging because this revolutionary technology pushes the very boundaries of the underlying framework used in coverage decisions. Some experts have called for the adaptation of the coverage framework to make it better equipped for assessing NGTS. Medicare's recent decision to cover NGTS makes this topic particularly urgent to examine. In this article, we discussed the previously proposed approaches for adaptation of the NGTS coverage framework, highlighted their innovations, and outlined remaining gaps in their ability to assess the features of NGTS. We then compared the three approaches with Medicare's national coverage determination for NGTS and discussed its implications for US private payers as well as for other technologies and clinical areas. We focused on US payers because analyses of coverage approaches and policies in the large and complex US health care system may inform similar efforts in other countries. We concluded that further adaptation of the coverage framework will facilitate a better suited assessment of NGTS and future genomics innovations.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInsurance CarriersInsurance CoverageNeoplasmsinsurance coveragenext-generation sequencingprecision medicineprecision oncologyreimbursementtumor sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30224110
PMCPMC6374027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.