ReviewCritical care clinics2018
Measuring Outcomes After Critical Illness.
Review in Critical care clinics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a brief primary care intervention for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after critical illness on health-related quality of life - A secondary analysis of the PICTURE randomised controlled trial.The European journal of general practice · 2026Trial
- Cerebral oxygen desaturation events during and functional outcomes after prehospital anaesthesia: A prospective pilot study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Observational
- Article
- Curb Your Enthusiasm: Definitions, Adaptation, and Expectations for Quality of Life in ICU Survivorship.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
- The Future of Critical Care Lies in Quality Improvement and Education.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Article
- The authors reply.Critical care medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Outcomes after critical illness remain poorly understood. Conceptual models developed by other disciplines can serve as a framework by which to increase knowledge about outcomes after critical illness. This article reviews 3 models to understand the distinct but interrelated content of outcome domains, to review the components of functional status, and to describe how injuries and illnesses relate to disabilities and impairments afterward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.