Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223879›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2018

Origin of exon skipping-rich transcriptomes in animals driven by evolution of gene architecture.

Xavier Grau-Bové, Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo, Manuel Irimia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Interplays betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Full-Length Transcriptome of the Great Himalayan Leaf-Nosed Bats (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier Grau-BovéInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Iñaki Ruiz-TrilloInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. inaki.ruiz@ibe.upf-csic.es.
Manuel IrimiaCentre de Regulació Genòmica, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. mirimia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-2567
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

European Research Council 616960H2020 European Research Council ERC-2012-Co-616960H2020 European Research Council ERC-StG-LS2-637591Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad BFU2014-55076-PMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad BFU2014-57779-PMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad SEV-2012-0208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlternative splicing, particularly through intron retention and exon skipping, is a major layer of pre-translational regulation in eukaryotes. While intron retention is believed to be the most prevalent mode across non-animal eukaryotes, animals have unusually high rates of exon skipping. However, when and how this high prevalence of exon skipping evolved is unknown. Since exon skipping can greatly expand proteomes, answering these questions sheds light on the evolution of higher organismal complexity in metazoans.

resultsWe used RNA-seq data to quantify exon skipping and intron retention frequencies across 65 eukaryotic species, with particular focus on early branching animals and unicellular holozoans. We found that only bilaterians have significantly increased their exon skipping frequencies compared to all other eukaryotic groups. Unlike in other eukaryotes, however, exon skipping in nearly all animals, including non-bilaterians, is strongly enriched for frame-preserving sequences, suggesting that exon skipping involvement in proteome expansion predated the increase in frequency. We also identified architectural features consistently associated with higher exon skipping rates within all studied eukaryotic genomes. Remarkably, these architectures became more prevalent during animal evolution, indicating co-evolution between genome architectures and exon skipping frequencies.

conclusionWe suggest that the increase of exon skipping rates in animals followed a two-step process. First, exon skipping in early animals became enriched for frame-preserving events. Second, bilaterian ancestors dramatically increased their exon skipping frequencies, likely driven by the interplay between a shift in their genome architectures towards more exon definition and recruitment of frame-preserving exon skipping events to functionally diversify their cell-specific proteomes.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingEvolution, MolecularExonsAnimalsGenomeIntronsTranscriptomeAlternative splicingAncestral reconstructionEvolution of transcriptome regulationExon skippingGene architectureIntron retention

Identifiers

PMID30223879
PMCPMC6142364
OpenAlexW2890548342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.