Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223834›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2018

What have we learned from observational studies and clinical trials of mild to moderate COPD?

Miriam Barrecheguren, Cruz González, Marc Miravitlles

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in severe mental illness: A timely diagnosis to advance the process of quitting smoking.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Early COPD: current evidence for diagnosis and management.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam BarrechegurenPneumology Department, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), P. de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Cruz GonzálezPneumology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Valencia, Spain.
Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), P. de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. mmiravitlles@vhebron.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9850-9520
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital Universitari de Vic · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is well established that patients with mild to moderate disease represent the majority of patients with COPD, and patients with mild COPD already have measurable physiological impairment with increased morbidity and a higher risk of mortality compared with healthy non-smoking individuals. However, this subpopulation is both underdiagnosed and undertreated. In addition, most clinical trials include cohorts of patients with worse lung function and quality of life, which are very different from the milder patients usually seen in primary care.Clinical trials have shown that mild-moderate COPD patients present an improvement in lung function after treatment with long-acting bronchodilators (LABD). Inhaled therapy has also shown benefits in terms of symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and exacerbation prevention in this population. Early intervention might have also a positive effect to prevent functional impairment. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence from randomised clinical trials and real-life studies about the importance of pharmacological treatment in early stages of COPD to improve long-term outcomes. New concepts such as clinically important deterioration may help to investigate the impact of interventions on the natural history of the disease.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansObservational Studies as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeBronchodilator AgentsCOPDDiagnosisEpidemiologyGuidelinesMild-moderate diseasePhysical activityQuality of lifeTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30223834
PMCPMC6142698
OpenAlexW2890564445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.