Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223808›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

A qualitative evaluation of hospital versus community-based management of patients on injectable treatments for tuberculosis.

D B Cohen, M Phiri, H Banda, S B Squire, I Namakhoma, N Desmond

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Development of a Layperson Injector Training for the Home-Based Administration of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapies for Persons With HIV.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D B CohenMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Box 30096, Blantyre 3, Malawi. Danielle.Cohen@sheffield.ac.uk.
M PhiriMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Box 30096, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
H BandaREACH Trust, Box 1597, Lilongwe, Malawi.
S B SquireLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembrooke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PH, UK.
I NamakhomaREACH Trust, Box 1597, Lilongwe, Malawi.
N DesmondMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Box 30096, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBResearch for Equity And Community Health Trust · MWMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme · MWUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097466/B/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients being treated for recurrent or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) require long courses of injectable anti-tuberculous agents. In order to maintain strong TB control programmes, it is vital that the experiences of people who receive long-term injectables for TB are well understood. To investigate the feasibility of a novel model of care delivery, a clinical trial (The TB-RROC Study) was conducted at two central hospitals in Malawi. Hospital-based care was compared to a community-based approach for patients on TB retreatment in which 'guardians' (patient-nominated lay people) were trained to deliver injections to patients at home. This study is the qualitative evaluation of the TB-RROC trial. It examines the experiences of people receiving injectables as part of TB treatment delivered in hospital and community-based settings.

methodsA qualitative evaluation of the TB-RROC intervention was conducted using phenomenographic methods. Trial participants were purposively sampled, and in-depth interviews were conducted with patients and guardians in both arms of the trial. Key informant interviews and observations in the wards and community were performed. Thematic content analysis was used to derive analytical themes.

resultsFourteen patients, 12 guardians and 9 key informants were interviewed. Three key themes relating to TB retreatment emerged: medical experiences (including symptoms, treatment, and HIV); the effects of the physical environment (conditions on the ward, disruption to daily routines and livelihoods); and trust (in other people, the community and in the health system). Experiences were affected by the nature of a person's prior role in their community and resulted in a range of emotional responses. Patients and guardians in the community benefited from better environment, social interactions and financial stability. Concerns were expressed about the potential for patients' health or relationships to be adversely affected in the community. These potential concerns were rarely realised.

conclusionsGuardian administered intramuscular injections were safe and well received. Community-based care offered many advantages over hospital-based care for patients receiving long-term injectable treatment for TB and their families.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultAntitubercular AgentsCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHospitalsHumansInjectionsLong-Term CareMalawiMaleQualitative ResearchRecurrenceTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsCommunity-based careInjectorsIn-patientMalawiOPATStreptomycinTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID30223808
PMCPMC6142700
OpenAlexW2890587114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.