Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223786›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2018

Apparent diffusion coefficient as an effective index for the therapeutic efficiency of brain chemoradiotherapy for brain metastases from lung cancer.

Kai Liu, Zenglin Ma, Lili Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain diffusion MRI biomarkers after oncology treatments.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Can Discriminate the Primary Cell Type of Intracranial Metastases for Patients with Lung Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 51 Xiaoguan Street, Andingmenwai, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zenglin MaDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 51 Xiaoguan Street, Andingmenwai, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. zenglinma@163.com.
Lili FengDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 51 Xiaoguan Street, Andingmenwai, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Independent topic selection of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine in 2016 2016-JYB-JSMS-066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value alteration before and after chemoradiotherapy as a potential monitor for therapeutic efficiency of treatment for brain metastases from lung cancer were discussed.

methodThirty lung cancer patients with brain metastases, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) were performed one week before chemoradiotherapy and after one treatment cycle and two treatment cycles. 43 tumor lesions were divided into effective group and invalid group according to the changes of the tumor size. The differences in ADC values at different time points before and after treatment in each treatment group were analyzed.

resultThe maximum diameter of the tumor was no difference after one treatment cycle, but decreased after two treatment cycles. ADC values significantly increased after both one and two treatment cycles. In effective group, the ADC values were significantly increased after one and two treatment cycles. While, there are no difference in invalid group after one treatment cycle but decreased after two treatment cycles. ΔADC values in effective group after one and two treatment cycles were both significantly higher than those in the invalid group. ROC curve analysis then revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) of ΔADC after one treatment was 0.872.

conclusionADC values in brain metastases from lung cancer can help monitor and dynamically observe the therapeutic efficiency of whole brain chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveTreatment OutcomeApparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)Brain metastasesMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Therapeutic efficiency

Identifiers

PMID30223786
PMCPMC6142399
OpenAlexW2891391491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.