Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223780›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden - a qualitative study.

Sunita Panda, Deirdre Daly, Cecily Begley, Annika Karlström, Birgitta Larsson, Lena Bäck, Ingegerd Hildingsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sunita PandaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 2 Clare Street, D02 CK80, Dublin, Ireland. spanda@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-1045
Deirdre DalySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin, D02 T283, Ireland.
Cecily BegleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin, D02 T283, Ireland.
Annika KarlströmDepartment of Nursing, Mid Sweden University, 86170, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Birgitta LarssonDepartment of Nursing, Mid Sweden University, 86170, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Lena BäckDepartment of Nursing, Mid Sweden University, 86170, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Ingegerd HildingssonDepartment of Nursing, Mid Sweden University, 86170, Sundsvall, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRising rates of caesarean section (CS) are a concern in many countries, yet Sweden has managed to maintain low CS rates. Exploring the multifactorial and complex reasons behind the rising trend in CS has become an important goal for health professionals. The aim of the study was to explore Swedish obstetricians' and midwives' perceptions of the factors influencing decision-making for CS in nulliparous women in Sweden.

methodsA qualitative design was chosen to gain in-depth understanding of the factors influencing the decision-making process for CS. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants. Four audio-recorded focus group interviews (FGIs), using an interview guide with open ended questions, were conducted with eleven midwives and five obstetricians from two selected Swedish maternity hospitals after obtaining written consent from each participant. Data were managed using NVivo

resultsThe thematic analysis resulted in three main themes; 'Belief in normal birth - a cultural perspective'; 'Clarity and consistency - a system perspective' and 'Obstetrician makes the final decision, but...', and each theme contained a number of subthemes. However, 'Belief in normal birth' emerged as the core central theme, overarching the other two themes.

conclusionFindings suggest that believing that normal birth offers women and babies the best possible outcome contributes to having and maintaining a low CS rate. Both midwives and obstetricians agreed that having a shared belief (in normal birth), a common goal (of achieving normal birth) and providing mainly midwife-led care within a 'team approach' helped them achieve their goal and keep their CS rate low.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingCesarean SectionFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMidwiferyObstetricsParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchSwedenCaesarean sectionDecision-makingMidwife-led careMidwivesNormal birthNulliparousObstetriciansQualitative

Identifiers

PMID30223780
PMCPMC6142337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.