Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223618›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2018

Detection of Caries Around Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Compomer Restorations Using Four Different Modalities In Vitro.

Tamara Abrams, Stephen Abrams, Koneswaran Sivagurunathan, Veronika Moravan, Warren Hellen, Gary Elman, Bennett Amaechi, Andreas Mandelis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara AbramsQuantum Dental Technologies Inc., Toronto, ON M6B 1L3, Canada. tabrams@uoguelph.ca.
Stephen AbramsQuantum Dental Technologies Inc., Toronto, ON M6B 1L3, Canada. dr.abrams4cell@sympatico.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-7805
Koneswaran SivagurunathanQuantum Dental Technologies Inc., Toronto, ON M6B 1L3, Canada. konesh@thecanarysystem.com.
Veronika MoravanVM Stats, Toronto, ON M5A 4R3, Canada. vmoravan@vmstats.ca.
Warren HellenCliffcrest Dental Office, Toronto, ON M1M 1P1, Canada. wmph@rogers.com.
Gary ElmanCliffcrest Dental Office, Toronto, ON M1M 1P1, Canada. garyelman@sympatico.ca.
Bennett AmaechiDepartment of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. amaechi@uthscsa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-4466
Andreas MandelisCenter for Advanced Diffusion Wave and Photoacoustic Technologies (CADIPT), Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada. mandelis@mie.utoronto.ca.
Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada) · CAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of visual examination (International Caries Detection and Assessment System-ICDAS II), light-emitting diodes (LED) fluorescence (SPECTRA), laser fluorescence (DIAGNODent, DD), photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence (PTR-LUM, The Canary System, CS) to detect natural decay beneath resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and compomer restorations in vitro. Twenty-seven extracted human molars and premolars, consisting of 2 control teeth, 10 visually healthy/sound and 15 teeth with natural cavitated lesions, were selected. For the carious teeth, caries was removed leaving some carious tissue on one wall of the preparation. For the sound teeth, 3 mm deep cavity preparations were made. All cavities were restored with RMGIC or compomer restorative materials. Sixty-eight sites (4 sites on sound unrestored teeth, 21 sound sites and 43 carious sites with restorations) were selected. CS and DD triplicate measurements were done at 2, 1.5, 0.5, and 0 mm away from the margin of the restoration (MOR). SPECTRA images were taken, and two dentists provided ICDAS II scoring for the restored surfaces. The SPECTRA data and images were inconclusive due to signal interference from the restorations. Visual examinations of the restored tooth surfaces were able to identify 5 of the 15 teeth with caries. In these situations, the teeth were ranked as having ICDAS II 1 or 2 rankings, but they could not identify the location of the caries or depth of the lesion. CS and DD were able to differentiate between sound and carious tissue at the MOR, but larger variation in measurement, and poorer accuracy, was observed for DD. It was concluded that the CS has the potential to detect secondary caries around RMGIC and compomer restorations more accurately than the other modalities used in this study.

Indexed as

cariescaries around restoration marginscaries detectioncompomerDIAGNODentICDAS IIPTR-LUMresin-modified glass ionomerSPECTRA

Identifiers

PMID30223618
PMCPMC6162688
OpenAlexW2891360088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.