Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223551›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Detecting and Visualizing Outliers in Provider Profiling Using Funnel Plots and Mixed Effects Models-An Example from Prescription Claims Data.

Oliver Hirsch, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Maike Schulz, Michael Erhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver HirschDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str.4, 35043 Marburg, Germany. oliver.hirsch@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-2554
Norbert Donner-BanzhoffDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str.4, 35043 Marburg, Germany. norbert@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Maike SchulzCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (ZI), Salzufer 8, 10587 Berlin, Germany. mschulz@zi.de.
Michael ErhartCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (ZI), Salzufer 8, 10587 Berlin, Germany. merhart@zi.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When prescribing a drug for a patient, a physician also has to consider economic aspects. We were interested in the feasibility and validity of profiling based on funnel plots and mixed effect models for the surveillance of German ambulatory care physicians' prescribing. We analyzed prescriptions issued to patients with a health insurance card attending neurologists' and psychiatrists' ambulatory practices in the German federal state of Saarland. The German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians developed a prescribing assessment scheme (PAS) which contains a systematic appraisal of the benefit of drugs for so far 12 different indications. The drugs have been classified on the basis of their clinical evidence as "standard", "reserve" or "third level" medication. We had 152.583 prescriptions in 56 practices available for analysis. A total of 38.796 patients received these prescriptions. The funnel plot approach with additive correction for overdispersion was almost equivalent to a mixed effects model which directly took the multilevel structure of the data into account. In the first case three practices were labeled as outliers, the mixed effects model resulted in two outliers. We suggest that both techniques should be routinely applied within a surveillance system of prescription claims data.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedAmbulatory CareDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug Monitoring Programsambulatory caredrug prescriptionsreference standardsstatistical data interpretation

Identifiers

PMID30223551
PMCPMC6163340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.