Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223528›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

miRmapper: A Tool for Interpretation of miRNA⁻mRNA Interaction Networks.

Willian A da Silveira, Ludivine Renaud, Jonathan Simpson, William B Glen, Edward S Hazard, Dongjun Chung, Gary Hardiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex Disparity in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dysregulation of miR-1-3p: An Early Event in Colitis-Associated Dysplasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Willian A da SilveiraCenter for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. silveira@musc.edu.
Ludivine RenaudDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. renaudl@musc.edu.
Jonathan SimpsonCenter for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. jondsimp@gmail.com.
William B GlenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. glen@musc.edu.
Edward S HazardCenter for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. hazards@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-7642
Dongjun ChungDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. chungd@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-5671
Gary HardimanCenter for Genomic Medicine, Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. G.Hardiman@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4558-0400

Funding

Statistical Models for Genetic Studies, Using Network and Integrative AnalysisR01GM122078 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, DONGJUN · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Algorithms for Literature-Guided Multi-Platform Identification of Cancer SubtypesR21CA209848 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CHUNG, DONGJUN, KELEMEN, LINDA E · 2016 to 2017
$358k
NCI NIH HHS CA209848NIGMS NIH HHS GM122078NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that 30% of all genes in the mammalian cells are regulated by microRNA (miRNAs). The most relevant miRNAs in a cellular context are not necessarily those with the greatest change in expression levels between healthy and diseased tissue. Differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs that modulate a large number of messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts ultimately have a greater influence in determining phenotypic outcomes and are more important in a global biological context than miRNAs that modulate just a few mRNA transcripts. Here, we describe the development of a tool, "miRmapper", which identifies the most dominant miRNAs in a miRNA⁻mRNA network and recognizes similarities between miRNAs based on commonly regulated mRNAs. Using a list of miRNA⁻target gene interactions and a list of DE transcripts, miRmapper provides several outputs: (1) an adjacency matrix that is used to calculate miRNA similarity utilizing the Jaccard distance; (2) a dendrogram and (3) an identity heatmap displaying miRNA clusters based on their effect on mRNA expression; (4) a miRNA impact table and (5) a barplot that provides a visual illustration of this impact. We tested this tool using nonmetastatic and metastatic bladder cancer cell lines and demonstrated that the most relevant miRNAs in a cellular context are not necessarily those with the greatest fold change. Additionally, by exploiting the Jaccard distance, we unraveled novel cooperative interactions between miRNAs from independent families in regulating common target mRNAs; i.e., five of the top 10 miRNAs act in synergy.

Indexed as

algorithm development for network integrationbioinformatics pipelinesmiRNA–gene expression networksmultiomics integrationnetwork topology analysis

Identifiers

PMID30223528
PMCPMC6162471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.