Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223458›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Exploring Peptide⁻Solvent Interactions: A Computational Study.

Nadia Elghobashi-Meinhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nadia Elghobashi-MeinhardtTheoretical Molecular Biophysics, Department of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 36a, 14169 Berlin, Germany. nadia.elghobashi-meinhardt@fu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-6856

Funding

Volkswagen Foundation 86 539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dilemma of reconciling the contradictory evidence regarding the conformation of long solvated peptide chains is the so-called "reconciliation problem". Clues regarding the stability of certain conformations likely lie in the electronic structure at the peptide⁻solvent interface, but the peptide⁻solvent interaction is not fully understood. Here, we study the influence of aqueous solvent on peptide conformations by using classical molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) energy calculations. The model systems include an 11-residue peptide, X 2 A 7 O 2 (XAO), where X, A, and O denote diaminobutyric acid, alanine, and ornithine, respectively, and a 9-mer (Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Ala-Phe-Lys). Spectroscopic and MD data present conflicting evidence regarding the structure of XAO in water; some results indicate that XAO adopts a polyproline II (P II ) conformation, whereas other findings suggest that XAO explores a range of conformations. To investigate this contradiction, we present here the results of MD simulations of XAO and the 9-mer in aqueous solution, combined with QM/MM energy calculations.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationPeptidesProtein ConformationQuantum TheorySolventsPeptidesSolventsaqueous solventmolecular dynamics (MD)peptidespolyproline IIquantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM)XAO peptide

Identifiers

PMID30223458
PMCPMC6225229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.