ReviewNutrients2018
Selected Psychological Aspects of Meat Consumption-A Short Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive Compounds of Porcine Hearts and Aortas May Improve Cardiovascular Disorders in Humans.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Food and Medicine Homology Substances as Potential Modulators of the Gut-Muscle Axis in Animal Meat Quality: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Meat consumption among different social groups and specific options for reducing it: a literature review of empirical research.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Review
- Article
- Validity of cold storage and heat treatment on the deactivation ofItalian journal of food safety · 2024Article
- Theory of Food: Unravelling the Lifelong Impact of Childhood Dietary Habits on Adult Food Preferences across Different Diet Groups.Nutrients · 2024Article
- How Different Dimensions Shape the Definition of Meat Alternative Products: A Scoping Review of Evidence between 2000 and 2021.Current developments in nutrition · 2023Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and genome editing to support a sustainable livestock.Animal reproduction · 2023Article
- Acceptability of policies to reduce consumption of red and processed meat: A population-based survey experiment.Journal of environmental psychology · 2022Article
- The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply.Food security · 2022Article
- The Effect of Labelling and Visual Properties on the Acceptance of Foods Containing Insects.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Evaluating adults' health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Article
- Health Benefits of a Plant-Based Dietary Pattern and Implementation in Healthcare and Clinical Practice.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eating meat is deeply entrenched in Western culture. It is often associated with wealth and a highly nutritional diet; and for many people it is also an established habit that is difficult to change. The second half of the 20th century was a period of rapid growth in meat consumption, which resulted in intensified meat production. At the same time, eating meat has recently become subject to criticism for health-related, environmental or humanitarian reasons. This review aims to signal the potential consequences of a change of diet or switching to diets that are rich/poor in certain ingredients on the functioning of the hormonal and nervous system, which translates into changes in mood and behavior. This paper discusses the psychological phenomena which underlie the difficulty of changing one's food preferences and problems encountered while adding new products to the daily diet. Finally, this study summarizes the limitations of modifying eating habits that have resulted from established attitudes and habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.