Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30223440›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Comparison of Antibacterial Adhesion When Salivary Pellicle Is Coated on Both Poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate)- and Polyethylene-glycol-methacrylate-grafted Poly(methyl methacrylate).

Bor-Shiunn Lee, Yu-Jia Chen, Ta-Chin Wei, Tien-Li Ma, Che-Chen Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bio-inspired special wettability in oral antibacterial applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The salivary pellicle on dental biomaterials.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bor-Shiunn LeeGraduate Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, No.1, Changde St., Jhongjheng District, Taipei 100, Taiwan. leebs@ntu.edu.tw.
Yu-Jia ChenGraduate Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, No.1, Changde St., Jhongjheng District, Taipei 100, Taiwan. bmjdi10607@gmail.com.
Ta-Chin WeiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, 200, Chung Pei Rd., Chung Li 320, Taiwan. tcwei@cycu.edu.tw.
Tien-Li MaGraduate Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, No.1, Changde St., Jhongjheng District, Taipei 100, Taiwan. lily4714734@yahoo.com.tw.
Che-Chen ChangDepartment of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. cchang@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWChung Yuan Christian University · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 106-2314-B-002-022-MY3, 105-2113-M-002-011National Taiwan University Hospital 106-003365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) and polyethylene glycol methacrylate (PEGMA) have been demonstrated to inhibit bacterial adhesion, no study has compared antibacterial adhesion when salivary pellicle is coated on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) grafted with pHEMA and on PMMA grafted with PEGMA. In this study, PMMA discs were fabricated from a commercial orthodontic acrylic resin system (Ortho-Jet). Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectra taken before and after grafting confirmed that pHEMA and PEGMA were successfully grafted on PMMA. Contact angle measurements revealed PMMA-pHEMA to be the most hydrophilic, followed by PMMA-PEGMA, and then by PMMA. Zeta potential analysis revealed the most negative surface charges on PMMA-PEGMA, followed by PMMA-pHEMA, and then by PMMA. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed green fluorescence in the background, indicating images that influenced the accuracy of the quantification of live bacteria. Both the optical density value measured at 600 nm and single plate-serial dilution spotting showed that pHEMA was more effective than PEGMA against

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleDental PellicleMethacrylatesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethyl MethacrylateAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial AdhesionMicroscopy, ConfocalSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, Biocompatiblehydroxyethyl methacrylateMethacrylatespolyethylene glycol methacrylatePolyethylene GlycolsPolymethyl Methacrylateanti-adhesionantibacterial adhesionbiocompatibilitydentistryorthodonticpellicle coatingprosthesesprotein adsorptionserial dilution spotting

Identifiers

PMID30223440
PMCPMC6164387
OpenAlexW2891195845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.