Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30222746›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Model-based spatial navigation in the hippocampus-ventral striatum circuit: A computational analysis.

Ivilin Peev Stoianov, Cyriel M A Pennartz, Carien S Lansink, Giovani Pezzulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep Hybrid Models: Infer and Plan in a Dynamic World.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Flexible intentions: An Active Inference theory.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivilin Peev StoianovInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Cyriel M A PennartzUniversity of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences-Center for Neuroscience Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-1175
Carien S LansinkUniversity of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences-Center for Neuroscience Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giovani PezzuloInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-8282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the neurobiology of simple and habitual choices is relatively well known, our current understanding of goal-directed choices and planning in the brain is still limited. Theoretical work suggests that goal-directed computations can be productively associated to model-based (reinforcement learning) computations, yet a detailed mapping between computational processes and neuronal circuits remains to be fully established. Here we report a computational analysis that aligns Bayesian nonparametrics and model-based reinforcement learning (MB-RL) to the functioning of the hippocampus (HC) and the ventral striatum (vStr)-a neuronal circuit that increasingly recognized to be an appropriate model system to understand goal-directed (spatial) decisions and planning mechanisms in the brain. We test the MB-RL agent in a contextual conditioning task that depends on intact hippocampus and ventral striatal (shell) function and show that it solves the task while showing key behavioral and neuronal signatures of the HC-vStr circuit. Our simulations also explore the benefits of biological forms of look-ahead prediction (forward sweeps) during both learning and control. This article thus contributes to fill the gap between our current understanding of computational algorithms and biological realizations of (model-based) reinforcement learning.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBehavior, AnimalBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationConditioning, ClassicalDecision MakingHippocampusHumansLearningMachine LearningMaze LearningMedical Informatics

Identifiers

PMID30222746
PMCPMC6160242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.