Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30222735›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Abstract concept learning in a simple neural network inspired by the insect brain.

Alex J Cope, Eleni Vasilaki, Dorian Minors, Chelsea Sabo, James A R Marshall, Andrew B Barron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transitions in cognitive evolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex J CopeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6042-1542
Eleni VasilakiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3705-7070
Dorian MinorsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-3433
Chelsea SaboDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3946-4609
James A R MarshallDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-167X
Andrew B BarronDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity to learn abstract concepts such as 'sameness' and 'difference' is considered a higher-order cognitive function, typically thought to be dependent on top-down neocortical processing. It is therefore surprising that honey bees apparantly have this capacity. Here we report a model of the structures of the honey bee brain that can learn sameness and difference, as well as a range of complex and simple associative learning tasks. Our model is constrained by the known connections and properties of the mushroom body, including the protocerebral tract, and provides a good fit to the learning rates and performances of real bees in all tasks, including learning sameness and difference. The model proposes a novel mechanism for learning the abstract concepts of 'sameness' and 'difference' that is compatible with the insect brain, and is not dependent on top-down or executive control processing.

Indexed as

CognitionNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalBrainComputer SimulationLearningMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalMushroom BodiesOdorantsProbabilitySoftware

Identifiers

PMID30222735
PMCPMC6160224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.