ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Preprocessing Sequence Coverage Data for More Precise Detection of Copy Number Variations.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validated WGS and WES protocols proved saliva-derived gDNA as an equivalent to blood-derived gDNA for clinical and population genomic analyses.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Copy Number Variation Detection Using Total Variation.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variation (CNV) is a type of genomic/genetic variation that plays an important role in phenotypic diversity, evolution, and disease susceptibility. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have created an opportunity for more accurate detection of CNVs with higher resolution. However, efficient and precise detection of CNVs remains challenging due to high levels of noise and biases, data heterogeneity, and the "big data" nature of NGS data. Sequence coverage (readcount) data are mostly used for detecting CNVs, specially for whole exome sequencing data. Readcount data are contaminated with several types of biases and noise that hinder accurate detection of CNVs. In this work, we introduce a novel preprocessing pipeline for reducing noise and biases to improve the detection accuracy of CNVs in heterogeneous NGS data, such as cancer whole exome sequencing data. We have employed several normalization methods to reduce readcount's biases that are due to GC content of reads, read alignment problems, and sample impurity. We have also developed a novel efficient and effective smoothing approach based on Taut String to reduce noise and increase CNV detection power. Using simulated and real data we showed that employing the proposed preprocessing pipeline significantly improves the accuracy of CNV detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.