ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2018
The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Gamification on Performance and Subjective Listening Effort on a Spatial Release From Masking Task.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Influences of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, listening effort, and sound quality among adults with severe to profound hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Effects of Gamification on Assessment of Spatial Release From Masking.American journal of audiology · 2023Article
- Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties.American journal of audiology · 2022Article
- Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.Seminars in hearing · 2018Review
- Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
- Prevalence and Characteristics of Veterans with Severe Hearing Loss: A Descriptive Study.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. PURPOSE: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. RESEARCH
designA within-subjects design was used. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition.
resultsFor speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids.
conclusionsThe present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.