Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30222545›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2018

The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Pamela Souza, Eric Hoover, Michael Blackburn, Frederick Gallun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela SouzaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Eric HooverAuditory & Speech Sciences Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Michael BlackburnVeterans Administration Medical Center, St. Cloud, MN.
Frederick GallunNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR.

Funding

Acoustic and Perceptual Effects of WDRC AmplificationR01DC006014 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOUZA, PAMELA E. · 2005 to 2020
$3.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. PURPOSE: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. RESEARCH

designA within-subjects design was used. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition.

resultsFor speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids.

conclusionsThe present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30222545
PMCPMC6563909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.