Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30222523›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Definitive Radiotherapy With SBRT or IMRT Boost for Breast Cancer: Excellent Local Control and Cosmetic Outcome.

Yuta Shibamoto, Taro Murai, Kazushi Suzuki, Chisa Hashizume, Kengo Ohta, Yuki Yamada, Masanari Niwa, Akira Torii, Masashi Shimohira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Helical tomotherapy for asymptomatic chemotherapy-refractory or -unfit multiple (3 or more) metastases.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuta Shibamoto1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-8611
Taro Murai1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazushi Suzuki1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Chisa Hashizume2 Nagoya Radiosurgery Center, Nagoya Kyoritsu Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kengo Ohta1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuki Yamada1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Masanari Niwa1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Akira Torii1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Masashi Shimohira1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPHiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard for breast cancer treatment is surgery, but many women may desire to avoid surgery if possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether breast cancer could be cured with modern sophisticated radiation techniques with good cosmetic outcome. We have treated 18 patients with operable breast cancer by conventional whole-breast irradiation followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (primary tumor only) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (tumor plus axillary nodes) boost. The planned doses were 50 Gy in 25 fractions, 18 to 25.5 Gy in 3 fractions, and 20 Gy in 8 fractions, respectively, for the 3 modalities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered with 7 to 9 coplanar and noncoplanar fixed beams, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy was given by tomotherapy. Chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy was used depending on the stage and receptor status. In 9 recent patients, hydrogen peroxide was intratumorally injected twice a week before whole-breast irradiation. All treatments were well tolerable and there were no grade ≥3 toxicities. With a median follow-up period of 35 months (range, 8-120 months), only 1 patient developed local recurrence and 2 patients developed distant metastasis. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 93%, 85%, and 92%, respectively, at 3 years. In 50% of the patients, the irradiated breast became better rounded, and the position of the nipple of the irradiated breast became ≥1 cm higher compared to that of the unirradiated breast. Thus, the treated breasts may be more aesthetically favorable than before irradiation in these patients. This may become a treatment option for patients with operable breast cancer.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProgression-Free SurvivalRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedhydrogen peroxideintensity-modulated radiotherapyKORTUCstereotactic radiotherapytomotherapywhole-breast irradiation

Identifiers

PMID30222523
PMCPMC6141921
OpenAlexW2892208256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.