ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018
Interpreting Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Events in Proteins Using Atomistic Simulations: Case Studies on Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure Characterization of a Disordered Peptide Using In-Droplet Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Dynamics.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advances in Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry and the Pursuit of Challenging Biological Systems.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Protein Structure Prediction with Mass Spectrometry Data.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2022Review
- Prediction and Validation of a Protein's Free Energy Surface Using Hydrogen Exchange and (Importantly) Its Denaturant Dependence.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Structural Ensemble of the Insulin Monomer.Biochemistry · 2021Article
- Allosteric Pathways Originating at Cysteine Residues in Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Interpreting Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Experiments with Molecular Simulations: Tutorials and Applications of the HDXer Ensemble Reweighting Software [Article v1.0].Living journal of computational molecular science · 2021Article
- Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Review
- Dramatic Shape Changes Occur as CytochromeThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Interpretation of HDX Data by Maximum-Entropy Reweighting of Simulated Structural Ensembles.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Successes and challenges in simulating the folding of large proteins.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Review
- Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins as drug targets: Progress and future potentials.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Review
- An Interhelical Salt Bridge Controls Flexibility and Inhibitor Potency for Regulators of G-protein Signaling Proteins 4, 8, and 19.Molecular pharmacology · 2019Article
- Interlaboratory Comparison of Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Measurements of the Fab Fragment of NISTmAb.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Interplay of cysteine exposure and global protein dynamics in small-molecule recognition by a regulator of G-protein signaling protein.Proteins · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments are widely used in studies of protein dynamics. To predict the propensity of amide hydrogens for exchange with deuterium, several models have been reported in which computations of amide-hydrogen protection factors are carried out using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Given significant variation in the criteria used in different models, the robustness and broader applicability of these models to other proteins, especially homologous proteins showing distinct amide-exchange patterns, remains unknown. The sensitivity of the predictions when MD simulations are conducted with different force-fields is yet to tested and quantified. Using MD simulations and experimental HDX data on three homologous signaling proteins, we report detailed studies quantifying the performance of seven previously reported models (M1-M7) of two general types: empirical and fractional-population models. We find that the empirical models show inconsistent predictions but predictions of the fractional population models are robust. Contrary to previously reported work, we find that the solvent-accessible surface area of amide hydrogens is a useful metric when combined with a new metric defining the distances of amide hydrogens from the first polar atoms in proteins. On the basis of this, we report two new models, one empirical (M8) and one population-based (M9). We find strong protection of amide hydrogens from solvent exchange both within the stable helical motifs and also in the interhelical loops. We further observe that the exchange-competent states of amide hydrogens occur on the sub 100 ps time-scale via localized fluctuations, and such states among amides of a given protein do not appear to show any cooperativity or allosteric coupling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.