ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018
Pretreatment
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the lung parenchyma and the presence of subclinical interstitial lung disease on computed tomography as predictive factors for survival following stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 125 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy at our institute between December 2005 and March 2013 for various demographic and clinical parameters. The fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the lung parenchyma corrected with computed tomography value (tissue fraction-corrected standardized uptake value) was quantified using fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography before the therapy. Additionally, the radiological findings of interstitial lung disease on computed tomography were evaluated. The prognostic analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model for univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsThe median follow-up period was 39 months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 67.9%, and the 3-year progression-free survival rate was 52.0%. The multivariate analysis indicated that the tissue fraction-corrected standardized uptake value was correlated with the patients' overall survival ( P = .027, hazard ratio: 2.694, 95% confidence interval: 1.109-8.057). The presence of subclinical interstitial lung disease showed no correlation with the overall survival ( P = .535, hazard ratio: 1.256, 95% confidence interval: 0.592-2.473).
conclusionThe results indicated that fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the lung parenchyma, expressed as the tissue fraction-corrected standardized uptake value, was an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who have received stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.