Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30222029›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2018

Men With a "Woman's Disease": Stigmatization of Male Breast Cancer Patients-A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Evamarie Midding, Sarah Maria Halbach, Christoph Kowalski, Rainer Weber, Rachel Würstlein, Nicole Ernstmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A case report of male breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evamarie Midding1 Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR). Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sarah Maria Halbach1 Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR). Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph Kowalski3 German Cancer Society (DKG), Berlin, Germany.
Rainer Weber4 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Rachel Würstlein5 Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Nicole Ernstmann1 Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR). Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DEGerman Cancer Society · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare and known as a typical woman's disease. This study is part of the N-MALE project (Male breast cancer: patient's needs in prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and follow-up-care) and aims to investigate how MBC patients (MBCP) feel about suffering from a "woman's disease," what character the stigmatization has, and how it can be prospectively reduced. Therefore, a mixed methods design is applied including data of N = 27 qualitative interviews with MBCP and quantitative data of N = 100 MBCP. Findings identify a diverse picture, as stigmatization varies between contexts and patients: Most stigmatization concentrates on sexual stigmatization and ignorance of MBC and mostly occurs in cancer care systems and work-related contexts. The level of stigmatization varies with age and amount of treatment methods received, as reported within the created typology of different MBCP stigma types. To prospectively reduce stigmatization in MBCP, more publicity of MBC is needed, as well as gender-neutral communication and information material.

Indexed as

Social StigmaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast Neoplasms, MaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaireshealth services research(male) breast cancerMBCmedical sociologymixed methodsrare diseasestigma

Identifiers

PMID30222029
PMCPMC6199445
OpenAlexW2890567624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.