Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30221433›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of health psychology2019

A visual affective analysis of mass media interventions to increase antimicrobial stewardship amongst the public.

Darren Langdridge, Mark Davis, Lucyna Gozdzielewska, Joanna McParland, Lynn Williams, Mairi Young, Fraser Smith, Jennifer MacDonald, Lesley Price, Paul Flowers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Darren LangdridgeFaculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-9802
Mark DavisSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lucyna GozdzielewskaSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Joanna McParlandSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Lynn WilliamsSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Mairi YoungSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Fraser SmithSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Jennifer MacDonaldSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Lesley PriceSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Paul FlowersSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention (SHIP), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn an innovative approach to improve the contribution of health psychology to public health we have analysed the presence and nature of affect within the visual materials deployed in antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeting the public identified through systematic review.

designA qualitative analysis focused on the affective content of visual materials garnered from a systematic review of antibiotic stewardship (k = 20).

methodsA novel method was devised drawing on concepts from semiotics to analyse the affective elements within intervention materials.

resultsWhilst all studies examined tacitly rely on affect, only one sought to explicitly deploy affect. Three thematic categories of affect are identified within the materials in which specific ideological machinery is deployed: (1) monsters, bugs, and superheroes; (2) responsibility, threat, and the misuse/abuse of antibiotics; (3) the figure of the child.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates how affect is a present but tacit communication strategy of antimicrobial stewardship interventions but has not - to date - been adequately theorized or explicitly considered in the intervention design process. Certain affective features were explored in relation to the effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance interventions and warrant further investigation. We argue that further research is needed to systematically illuminate and capitalize upon the use of affect to effect behaviour change concerning antimicrobial stewardship. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? The (mis)use of antibiotics and consequent risk of antimicrobial resistance is a critical public health problem. If sufficient action is not taken, global society will face the 'post-antibiotic' era, in which common infections will lead to death for many millions. Key desirable behavioural changes are decreased patient demands for antibiotics, use of them for targeted purposes alone, and compliance with prescribed dosing. There is a growth of interest in the role of affect in mass media interventions designed to engage publics and produce health-related behavioural change. What does this study add? This article presents a novel analytic approach to understanding and intervening within behaviour change in public health that may complement other types of analysis. We present findings specifically from an 'affective' analysis based on semiotics in which we critically interrogated the visual imagery being deployed in mass media public health interventions concerning antimicrobial stewardship. Three thematic categories of affect are identified within the materials in which specific ideological machinery is deployed and that demonstrate some association with intervention effectiveness worthy of further investigation and testing.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipAudiovisual AidsHealth BehaviorMass MediaPersuasive CommunicationHumansPublic Healthaffectantimicrobial stewardshipbehaviour changemass media communicationsvisual materials

Identifiers

PMID30221433
PMCPMC6585774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.