Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30221368›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Auxiliary variable-enriched biomarker-stratified design.

Ting Wang, Xiaofei Wang, Haibo Zhou, Jianwen Cai, Stephen L George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ting WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Xiaofei WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7512-8445
Haibo ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-0093
Jianwen CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4945-6733
Stephen L GeorgeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3625-5852

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Statistical Methods for Outcome-Dependent SamplingR01ES021900 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZHOU, HAIBO · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Translational meta-analysis for elderly lung cancer patientsR21AG042894 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PANG, HERBERT, WANG, XIAOFEI · 2013 to 2014
$373k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIA NIH HHS R21 AG042894NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials in the era of precision medicine require assessment of biomarkers to identify appropriate subgroups of patients for targeted therapy. In a biomarker-stratified design (BSD), biomarkers are measured on all patients and used as stratification variables. However, such a trial can be both inefficient and costly, especially when the prevalence of the subgroup of primary interest is low and the cost of assessing the biomarkers is high. Efficiency can be improved and costs reduced by using enriched biomarker-stratified designs, in which patients of primary interest, typically the biomarker-positive patients, are oversampled. We consider a special type of enrichment design, an auxiliary variable-enriched design (AEBSD), in which enrichment is based on some inexpensive auxiliary variable that is positively correlated with the true biomarker. The proposed AEBSD reduces the total cost of the trial compared with a standard BSD when the prevalence rate of true biomarker positivity is small and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the auxiliary biomarker is larger than the prevalence rate. In addition, for an AEBSD, we can immediately randomize the patients selected in the screening process without waiting for the result of the true biomarker test, reducing the treatment waiting time. We propose an adaptive Bayesian method to adjust the assumed PPV while the trial is ongoing. Numerical studies and an example illustrate the approach. An R package is available.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBayes TheoremCost SavingsHumansModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersadaptive designauxiliary variablesBayesian methodbiomarker-stratified designcost minimizationenrichment strategyprecision medicinesurvival timetreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID30221368
PMCPMC6279614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.