Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30221317›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2018

Teen driver system modeling: a tool for policy analysis.

Celestin Missikpode, Corinne Peek-Asa, Daniel V McGehee, James Torner, Wayne Wakeland, Robert Wallace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celestin MissikpodeDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. celestin-missikpode@uiowa.edu.
Corinne Peek-AsaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Daniel V McGeheeUniversity of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa city, IA, USA.
James TornerDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Wayne WakelandSystems Science Program, Portland State University, Oregon, USA.
Robert WallaceDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University of Iowa · USPortland State University · US

Funding

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Teen DrivingR01HD065095 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCGEHEE, DANIEL V., PEEK-ASA, CORINNE · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotor vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of teen deaths in spite of preventive efforts. Prevention strategies could be advanced through new analytic approaches that allow us to better conceptualize the complex processes underlying teen crash risk. This may help policymakers design appropriate interventions and evaluate their impacts.

methodsSystem Dynamics methodology was used as a new way of representing factors involved in the underlying process of teen crash risk. Systems dynamics modeling is relatively new to public health analytics and is a promising tool to examine relative influence of multiple interacting factors in predicting a health outcome. Dynamics models use explicit statements about the process being studied and depict how the elements within the system interact; this usually leads to discussion and improved insight. A Teen Driver System Model was developed by following an iterative process where causal hypotheses were translated into systems of differential equations. These equations were then simulated to test whether they can reproduce historical teen driving data. The Teen Driver System Model that we developed was calibrated on 47 newly-licensed teen drivers. These teens were recruited and followed over a period of 5-months. A video recording system was used to gather data on their driving events (elevated g-force, near-crash, and crash events) and miles traveled.

resultsThe analysis suggests that natural risky driving improvement curve follows a course of a slow improvement, then a faster improvement, and finally a plateau: that is, an S-shaped decline in driving events. Individual risky driving behavior depends on initial risk and driving exposure. Our analysis also suggests that teen risky driving improvement curve is created endogenously by several feedback mechanisms. A feedback mechanism is a chain of variables interacting with each other in such a way they form a closed path of cause and effect relationships.

conclusionsTeen risky driving improvement process is created endogenously by several feedback mechanisms. The model proposed in the present article to reflect this improvement process can spark discussion, which may pinpoint to additional processes that can benefit from further empirical research and result in improved insight.

Indexed as

Driving eventsDynamicsModelingPolicy analysisSystemsTeen

Identifiers

PMID30221317
PMCPMC6139293
OpenAlexW2889982703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.