Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30221204›Full record

ReviewBrain and neuroscience advances2018

Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition.

Anna S Mitchell, Rafal Czajkowski, Ningyu Zhang, Kate Jeffery, Andrew J D Nelson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and neuroscience advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Brain-wide activity mapping reveals the somatosensory cortex as a sex-specific regulator of hedonic feeding.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coordinated Representational Drift Across the Mouse Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna S MitchellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8996-1067
Rafal CzajkowskiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
Ningyu ZhangInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Kate JefferyInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-0378
Andrew J D NelsonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H020187/1Medical Research Council G0800329Wellcome Trust 110157/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrosplenial cortex is a region within the posterior neocortical system, heavily interconnected with an array of brain networks, both cortical and subcortical, that is, engaged by a myriad of cognitive tasks. Although there is no consensus as to its precise function, evidence from both human and animal studies clearly points to a role in spatial cognition. However, the spatial processing impairments that follow retrosplenial cortex damage are not straightforward to characterise, leading to difficulties in defining the exact nature of its role. In this article, we review this literature and classify the types of ideas that have been put forward into three broad, somewhat overlapping classes: (1) learning of landmark location, stability and permanence; (2) integration between spatial reference frames; and (3) consolidation and retrieval of spatial knowledge (schemas). We evaluate these models and suggest ways to test them, before briefly discussing whether the spatial function may be a subset of a more general function in episodic memory.

Indexed as

cingulate cortexdefault mode networkelectrophysiologyhippocampal formationimmediate-early genesLearningmemoryneuroimagingprimatethalamus

Identifiers

PMID30221204
PMCPMC6095108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.