ReviewCurrent transplantation reports2018
Approaches for Effective Clinical Application of Stem Cell Transplantation.
Review in Current transplantation reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Ethical Implications of Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Purposes: A Systematic Review.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison between Cultivated Oral Mucosa and Ocular Surface Epithelia for COMET Patients Follow-Up.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Education for the translation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Catching Them Early: Framework Parameters and Progress for Prenatal and Childhood Application of Advanced Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Optimizing large-scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns-Toward an animal-free production and a more accessible clinical application.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Immunomodulation and Regeneration Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Potential Therapy to Treat Coronavirus Disease 2019.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review highlights problems related to translation of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) from bench to bedsite. Regenerative medicine within the current regulatory frame reveals common hitches in the course of development, translation, and clinical application. This paper suggests outlining a path from the few examples of successfully approved vs unsuccessful advanced therapies. RECENT
findingsIn the multitude of ongoing studies, few of them achieved positive results with a final treatment available to patients; this result was possible due to multidisciplinary teams working together from the beginning of the development and during the hard route to standardization and clinical application. SUMMARY: The root of success of an advanced therapy requires not only the inescapable scientific and biological knowledge but also requires several contributions as regulatory, ethical, medical, and bio-engineering expertise, from the real beginning. A strong scientific rationale and an integrated network of expertises would contribute to a successful investment of available resources in advanced therapy medicinal products and to a greater confidence in future medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.