Article3 Biotech2018
Transcriptome analysis and physiological responses of the potato plantlets in vitro under red, blue, and white light conditions.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomic Insights into Molecular Response of Butter Lettuce to Different Light Wavelengths.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Transcriptome-based analysis of carotenoid accumulation-related gene expression in petals of Chinese cabbage (3 Biotech · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light is an important factor for plant development and has serious effects on the growth, production and quality of potatoes. However, the physical and molecular mechanisms by which potato plantlets cope with different light qualities are not understood. In this study, the potato "Zhuanxinwu", which is a germplasm potato resource with a high anthocyanin content, was used for physiological and transcriptome profiling analyses to uncover the different mechanisms that occur in response to blue, red and white light conditions, with the white light condition serving as the control. Multiple growth indexes, protective enzyme activity and metabolite accumulation were measured. The results indicated that white light promoted a shift in biomass allocation away from tubers to leaves to enhance dry leaf matter and reduce tuber fresh/dry weight relative to the effects of blue or red light. The leaf area and anthocyanin content values were greater for plants grown in blue light than those grown in white or red light, suggesting that combinations of different spectra were more conducive to regulating potato growth. A total of 2220 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found among the three samples, and the DEGs in the three comparison sets were analyzed. A total of 1180 and 984 DEGs were identified in the red light (Red) and blue light (Blue) conditions compared to the control condition, respectively, and 359 DEGs overlapped between the two comparison sets (Blue_vs_White and Red_vs_White). Interestingly, the 24 most common overlapped DEGs were involved in photosynthesis, respiration, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. Of these DEGs, four genes involved in photosynthesis and two genes involved in pigment synthesis were highly expressed, implying that some genes could be implemented to cope with different light spectra by regulating the expression of DEGs involved in the corresponding metabolic pathways. In conclusion, our study characterizes physiological responses of potato to different light qualities and identifies potential pathways and candidate genes involved in these responses, thus providing a basis for further research on artificial light regulation of potato plant growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.