ArticlePeerJ2018
Complete paternally inherited mitogenomes of two freshwater mussels
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The complete mitochondrial genomes of the freshwater musselMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome of freshwater pearl mussel Lamellidens marginalis (Lamarck, 1819) and its phylogenetic relation within unionidae family.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- No evidence of DUI in the Mediterranean alien species Brachidontes pharaonis (P. Fisher, 1870) despite mitochondrial heteroplasmy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Semimytilus algosus: first known hermaphroditic mussel with doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Unorthodox features in two venerid bivalves with doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondria.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Variability of mitochondrial ORFans hints at possible differences in the system of doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondria among families of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida).BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freshwater bivalves from the family Unionidae usually have two very divergent mitogenomes, inherited according to the doubly uniparental model. The early divergence of these two mitogenomic lineages gives a unique opportunity to use two mitogenomic data sets in a single phylogenetic context. However, the number of complete sequences of the maternally inherited mitogenomes of these animals available in GenBank greatly exceeds that of the paternally inherited mitogenomes. This is a problem for phylogenetic reconstruction because it limits the use of both mitogenomic data sets. Moreover, since long branch attraction phenomenon can bias reconstructions if only a few but highly divergent taxa are considered, the shortage of the faster evolving paternally inherited mitogenome sequences is a real problem. Here we provide, for the first time, complete sequences of the M mitogenomes sampled from Polish populations of two species: native
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.