ReviewMemo2018
Current and evolving treatment strategies in adult immune thrombocytopenia.
Review in Memo, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- A Case of Vancomycin-Induced Severe Immune Thrombocytopenia.Hematology reports · 2023Article
- Oral Manifestations in Children Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evolving treatment modalities for immune thrombocytopenia in adults.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2021Review
- Immune thrombocytopenic purpura.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2019Article
- Current Advance in Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in the Management of Thrombocytopenia Associated With Chronic Liver Disease: Focus on Avatrombopag.Clinical medicine insights. Blood disorders · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune phenomenon resulting in low platelet count and increased bleeding risk. Goals of upfront management include prompt control of severe bleeding-which is rare-as well as induction and maintenance of a hemostatic platelet count. Thus, optimal management of ITP patients is often challenging and requires a highly individualized approach. Many patients may not suffer significant bleeding despite severe thrombocytopenia and the risk of toxicity associated with treatment may outweigh its benefit. Most patients treated with standard first-line regimen of glucocorticoids achieve an initial response. However, the rate of long-term remission remains low and multiple lines of therapy are often required. Current investigations aim at defining the subgroup of patients at risk of relapse and providing intensified risk-balanced induction regimens to improve long-term disease control. This short review summarizes current and emerging treatment strategies in adult ITP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.