Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30220910›Full record

ReviewReviews in aquaculture2018

Applications of genotyping by sequencing in aquaculture breeding and genetics.

Diego Robledo, Christos Palaiokostas, Luca Bargelloni, Paulino Martínez, Ross Houston

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in aquaculture, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
41.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Diego RobledoThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Midlothian UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9616-5912
Christos PalaiokostasThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Midlothian UK.
Luca BargelloniDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science University of Padova Legnaro Padova Italy.
Paulino MartínezDepartment of Zoology Genetics and Physical Anthropology Faculty of Veterinary University of Santiago de Compostela Lugo Spain.
Ross HoustonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Midlothian UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-0762
Roslin Institute · GBUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H022007/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective breeding is increasingly recognized as a key component of sustainable production of aquaculture species. The uptake of genomic technology in aquaculture breeding has traditionally lagged behind terrestrial farmed animals. However, the rapid development and application of sequencing technologies has allowed aquaculture to narrow the gap, leading to substantial genomic resources for all major aquaculture species. While high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays for some species have been developed recently, direct genotyping by sequencing (GBS) techniques have underpinned many of the advances in aquaculture genetics and breeding to date. In particular, restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq) and subsequent variations have been extensively applied to generate population-level SNP genotype data. These GBS techniques are not dependent on prior genomic information such as a reference genome assembly for the species of interest. As such, they have been widely utilized by researchers and companies focussing on nonmodel aquaculture species with relatively small research communities. Applications of RAD-Seq techniques have included generation of genetic linkage maps, performing genome-wide association studies, improvements of reference genome assemblies and, more recently, genomic selection for traits of interest to aquaculture like growth, sex determination or disease resistance. In this review, we briefly discuss the history of GBS, the nuances of the various GBS techniques, bioinformatics approaches and application of these techniques to various aquaculture species.

Indexed as

aquaculturegenotypingnext‐generation sequencingrestriction‐site associated DNAselective breedingsingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID30220910
PMCPMC6128402
OpenAlexW2584773401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.