ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2018
A Scoping Review of Facilitators of Multi-Professional Collaboration in Primary Care.
Article in International journal of integrated care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Capabilities, opportunities and motivations in implementing guideline-oriented biopsychosocial low back pain management: perceptions of occupational healthcare professionals after an educational intervention.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Interprofessional follow-up for people at risk of type 2 diabetes in primary healthcare - a randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Trial
- Exploring diverse applications of team-based care in preventive medicine: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Inter-professional collaboration in family doctor teams of the Chinese primary care system: a thematic analysis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Grassroots development of interprofessional primary care teams: a qualitative study in Canadian family practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Italian healthcare professionals' role in advancing reforms within the Italian National Healthcare System, as outlined in the National Recovery and Resilience Plan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Perspectives of humanitarian actors on interprofessional care for persons living with diabetes: Lessons from Aleppo, Syria.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Co-creating a continuous leadership development program in rural municipal healthcare - an action research study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research.BMC primary care · 2024Review
- Measuring the determinants of implementation behavior in multiprofessional rehabilitation.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners' choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study.Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Article
- Municipal healthcare professionals' interprofessional collaboration during older patients' transitions in the municipal health and care services: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Talking the talk in junior interprofessional education: is healthcare terminology a barrier or facilitator?BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Implementation of an interprofessional collaboration in practice program: a feasibility study using social network analysis.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
- Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals Toward Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care Settings in a Middle Eastern Country.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- A Realist Synthesis of Interprofessional Collaboration in the Early Years; Becoming Familiar with Other Professionals.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
- The Role of Social Workers in Interprofessional Primary Healthcare Teams.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2020Article
- Relationships Among Structures, Team Processes, and Outcomes for Service Users in Quebec Mental Health Service Networks.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMulti-professional collaboration (MPC) is essential for the delivery of effective and comprehensive care services. As in other European countries, primary care in Norway is challenged by altered patient values and the increased expectations of health administrations to participate in team-based care. This scoping review reports on the organisational, processual, relational and contextual facilitators of collaboration between general practitioners (GP) and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) in primary care.
methodsA systematic search in specialist and Scandinavian databases retrieved 707 citations. Following the inclusion criteria, nineteen studies were considered eligible and examined according to Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. The retrieved literature was analysed employing a content analysis approach. A group of stakeholders commented on study findings to enhance study validity.
resultsPrimary care research into MPC is immature and emerging in Norway. Our analysis showed that introducing common procedures for documentation and handling of patient data, knowledge sharing, and establishing local specialised multi-professional teams, facilitates MPC. The results indicate that advancements in work practices benefit from an initial system-level foundation with focus on local management and MPC leadership. Further, our results show that it is preferable to enhance collaborative skills before introducing new professional teams, roles and responsibilities. Investing in professional relations could build trust, respect and continuity. In this respect, sufficient time must be allocated during the working day for professionals to share reflections and engage in mutual learning.
conclusionThere is a paucity of research concerning the application and management of MPC in Norwegian primary care. The work practices and relations between professionals, primary care institutions and stakeholders on a macro level is inadequate. Health care is a complex system in which HCPs need managerial support to harvest the untapped benefits of MPC in primary care. As international research demonstrates, local managers must be supported with infrastructure on a macro level to understand the embedding of practice and look at what professionals actually do and how they work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.