Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30220766›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental review : DR2018

Stigma-Based Bullying Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Valerie A Earnshaw, Sari L Reisner, David Menino, V Paul Poteat, Laura M Bogart, Tia N Barnes, Mark A Schuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental review : DR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Inclusive school practices for all youth: A European Cross-National Study of general, sexual orientation, and gender identity-based bullying.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valerie A EarnshawDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Sari L ReisnerDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David MeninoDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
V Paul PoteatCounseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura M BogartHealth Unit, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Tia N BarnesDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Mark A SchusterDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Understanding and Addressing Disclosure to Members of Social Networks among People Recovering from Substance Use DisordersK01DA042881 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI EARNSHAW, VALERIE ANN · 2017 to 2020
$756k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA042881NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth living with socially devalued characteristics (e.g., minority sexual orientation, race, and/or ethnicity; disability; obesity) experience frequent bullying. This stigma-based bullying undermines youths' wellbeing and academic achievement, with lifelong consequences. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommends developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based interventions to address stigma-based bullying. To characterize the existing landscape of these interventions, we conducted a systematic review of stigma-based bullying interventions targeting youth in any country published in the peer-reviewed literature between 2000 and 2015. Our analysis was guided by a theoretical framework of stigma-based bullying, which describes stigma-related factors at the societal, structural, interpersonal, and individual levels that lead to stigma-based bullying. We screened 8,240 articles and identified 22 research studies describing 21 interventions addressing stigma-based bullying. We found that stigma-based bullying interventions are becoming more numerous, yet are unevenly distributed across stigmas, geographic locations, and types of organizations. We further found that these interventions vary in the extent to which they incorporate theory and have been evaluated with a wide range of research designs and types of data. We recommend that future work address stigma-based bullying within multicomponent interventions, adopt interdisciplinary and theory-based approaches, and include rigorous and systematic evaluations. Intervening specifically on stigma-related factors is essential to end stigma-based bullying and improve the wellbeing of youth living with socially devalued characteristics.

Indexed as

bullyingdiscriminationinterventionpeer victimizationstigmayouth

Identifiers

PMID30220766
PMCPMC6135094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.