ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2018
Usefulness of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine to Predict Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a key mediator of vascular homeostasis and an independent predictor of the development of accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation. However, its association with clinical outcomes in heart transplant recipients has not been described. Plasma levels of ADMA were assayed within 8 weeks following transplantation (baseline) using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The primary end point was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, retransplantation, or death at 5-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess the association between baseline ADMA levels (stratified at 0.70 µM, a previously established cutoff) and cumulative event-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to adjust for other candidate predictors. In 69 heart transplant recipients at Stanford, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (16%)-4 percutaneous coronary intervention, 1 retransplant, and 6 deaths-during 5-years follow-up. Patients with baseline ADMA ≥0.70 µM had lower cumulative 5-year event-free survival (77% vs 93%, p = 0.059). In multivariate Cox analysis, baseline ADMA was the only significant predictor of the primary end point (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.72 per 0.1 µM; p = 0.031). This association remained significant even after restricting the end point to death or retransplantation (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.97 per 0.1 µM; p = 0.006). In conclusion, elevated baseline plasma levels of ADMA independently predicted 5-year clinical outcomes after heart transplantation, suggesting that ADMA has potential prognostic value in the heart transplant arena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.