Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30220303›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2018

Successful liver-directed gene delivery by ERCP-guided hydrodynamic injection (with videos).

Vivek Kumbhari, Ling Li, Klaus Piontek, Masaharu Ishida, Rongdang Fu, Bassem Khalil, Caroline M Garrett, Eleni Liapi, Anthony N Kalloo, Florin M Selaru

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Intrabiliary infusion of naked DNA vectors targets periportal hepatocytes in mice.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A review of the tortuous path of nonviral gene delivery and recent progress.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek KumbhariDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ling LiDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Klaus PiontekDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Masaharu IshidaDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rongdang FuDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Bassem KhalilDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Caroline M GarrettDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Eleni LiapiDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anthony N KallooDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Florin M SelaruDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; The Institute for NanoBio Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tissue biopsying with wireless microgrippers within gastrointestinal tractR01EB017742 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI David H Gracias, Florin Selaru · 2014 to 2026
$6.6M
Enhancing Liver Cancer Treatment With Image-Guided Magnetic HyperthermiaR01CA194574 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IVKOV, ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
(PQC-1) Driver Events In IBD-Associated Neoplastic ProgressionR01CA190040 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MELTZER, STEPHEN J, SELARU, FLORIN · 2014 to 2017
$2.5M
MicroRNA involvement in the regulation of biliary epitheliumK08DK090154 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SELARU, FLORIN · 2011 to 2015
$706k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190040NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194574NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017742NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK090154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsA simple, safe, targeted, and efficient in vivo DNA delivery system is necessary for clinical-grade liver-targeted gene therapy in humans. Intravascular hydrodynamic gene delivery has been investigated in large animal models, but translation to humans has been hampered by its technical challenges, invasiveness, and potential for significant cardiovascular adverse events. We posited that intrabiliary delivery of DNA plasmids via ERCP-guided hydrodynamic injection could overcome these obstacles.

methodsTwelve pigs (40-50 kg) were divided into 3 groups (4 per group) and survived 21, 30, or 60 days. ERCP was performed by inflating a balloon catheter in the common hepatic duct and creating a closed space between it and the liver parenchyma. Last, a solution composed of plasmid/sleeping beauty (SB) mix was injected under pressure through the catheter into the closed space. Swine were killed at the 3 different time points and liver tissue harvested. Plasmid DNA expression and functional translated protein expression were assessed.

resultsERCP-guided hydrodynamic delivery of naked plasmid DNA facilitated by pCytomegalovirus-Sleep Beauty (pCMV-SB) transposons was technically feasible and devoid of cardiovascular and local adverse events in all 12 pigs. Furthermore, plasmid DNA (both single and combination) was successfully transferred into swine hepatocytes in all 12 pigs. Additionally, stable integration of the DNA constructs in hepatocyte genomic DNA was reliably noted at all 3 time points. In the 4 swine that were kept alive to 60 days, successful genomic integration and subsequent protein expression was observed in the targeted liver tissue.

conclusionsERCP-guided hydrodynamic delivery of gene therapy may usher in the next chapter in gene therapy with the potential to impact a variety of single-gene, complex genetic, and epigenetic liver diseases. It also raises the possibility that other nucleic acid therapeutics (microRNA, lncRNA, siRNA, shRNA) could similarly be delivered.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsbeta CateninFeasibility StudiesGenetic TherapyHepatocytesInjectionsLiverPlasmidsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSwineTransduction, Geneticbeta CateninDNA Transposable ElementsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID30220303
PMCPMC6249687
OpenAlexW2811292900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.