Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30220057›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2019

Using multiplex networks to capture the multidimensional nature of social structure.

Sandra E Smith-Aguilar, Filippo Aureli, Laura Busia, Colleen Schaffner, Gabriel Ramos-Fernández

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Primates 2022 most-cited paper award.Primates; journal of primatology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Measuring dominance certainty and assessing its impact on individual and societal health in a nonhuman primate model: a network approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra E Smith-AguilarCentro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Unidad Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico. galadrielent@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-5496
Filippo AureliInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-013X
Laura BusiaInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-9130
Colleen SchaffnerInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-1814
Gabriel Ramos-FernándezInstituto de Investigación en Matemáticas Aplicadas y Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-3905

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 490429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network analysis has increasingly expanded our understanding of social structure in primates and other animal species. However, most studies use networks representing only one interaction type, when social relationships (and the emerging social structure) are the result of many types of interactions and their interplay through time. The recent development of tools facilitating the integrated analysis of multiple interaction types using multiplex networks has opened the possibility of extending the insight provided by social network analysis. We use a multiplex representation of interactions among the members of a group of wild Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi), to study their social structure. We constructed a six-layered multiplex network based on three indices of overt social interactions (aggression, embraces, grooming) and three distance-based indices (contact, proximity, and association). With tools provided by the MuxViz software, we assessed the relevance of including all six indices in our analysis, the role of individuals in the network (through node versatility), and the presence of modules and non-random triadic structures or motifs. The multiplex provided information which was not equivalent to any individual layer or to the simple aggregation of layers. Network patterns based on associations did not correspond with those observed for overt-interactions or for the multiplex structure. Males were the most versatile individuals, while multiplex modularity and motifs highlighted the relevance of different interaction types for the overall connectivity of the network. We conclude that the multiplex approach improves on previous methods by retaining valuable information from each interaction type and how it is patterned among individuals.

Indexed as

AtelinaeGroomingSocial BehaviorSocial NetworkingAggressionAnimalsFemaleMaleSoftwareAteles geoffroyiMultilayer networksNode versatilityRobert HindeSocial interactionsSocial network analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.