Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30220051›Full record

ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2018

Salvage esophagectomy combined with partial aortic wall resection following thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Masanobu Nakajima, Hiroto Muroi, Maiko Kikuchi, Satoru Yamaguchi, Kinro Sasaki, Takashi Tsuchioka, Yusuke Takei, Ikuko Shibasaki, Hirotsugu Fukuda, Hiroyuki Kato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masanobu NakajimaFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan. mnakajim@dokkyomed.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-7184
Hiroto MuroiFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Maiko KikuchiFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Satoru YamaguchiFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Kinro SasakiFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Takashi TsuchiokaFirst Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga-gun, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Yusuke TakeiDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Ikuko ShibasakiDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Hirotsugu FukudaDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Hiroyuki KatoFukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University · JPFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDefinitive chemoradiotherapy is useful for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, salvage esophagectomy is required when residual or recurrent tumor is evident after chemoradiotherapy. We performed salvage esophagectomy combined with partial aortic wall resection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic invasion, and we evaluated the results.

methodsFour patients underwent esophagectomy combined with aortic wall resection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair because the lesion was diagnosed as stage T4b. We evaluated short-term outcomes, including duration of thoracic surgery, blood loss, duration of intubation, intensive care unit stay, and postoperative morbidity, as well as survival after salvage surgery.

resultsLesions were resected with no intraoperative procedural adverse events. Mean thoracic operation time was 444 min, and mean thoracic blood loss was 506 g. In all patients, complete resection of the lesion was possible with no intraoperative adverse events. All patients were extubated on postoperative day 0, and all were discharged from the intensive care unit on postoperative day 1. One patient experienced grade II wound pain (bilateral chest pain), and another patient experienced difficult sputum expectoration (grade IIIA). The mean follow-up time was 19.8 months, and two patients were alive with no disease recurrence at the time of this report. However, the remaining two patients had died secondary to lymph node metastasis.

conclusionsSalvage esophagectomy combined with partial aortic wall resection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides acceptable short-term outcomes. Future studies are needed to evaluate long-term survival and patient selection criteria.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAorta, ThoracicChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSalvage TherapyVascular NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyEsophageal cancerSalvage esophagectomyThoracic endovascular aortic repair

Identifiers

PMID30220051
OpenAlexW2890067570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.