Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219993›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2020

Uric Acid Treatment After Stroke Prevents Long-Term Middle Cerebral Artery Remodelling and Attenuates Brain Damage in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats.

Elena Jiménez-Xarrié, Belén Pérez, Ana Paula Dantas, Lídia Puertas-Umbert, Joan Martí-Fabregas, Ángel Chamorro, Anna Maria Planas, Elisabet Vila, Francesc Jiménez-Altayó

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of uric acid in animal models of ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Jiménez-XarriéStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica (IIB)-Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Belén PérezDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Institut de Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Ana Paula DantasInstitut Clínic Cardiovascular, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Lídia Puertas-UmbertDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Institut de Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Joan Martí-FabregasStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica (IIB)-Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Ángel ChamorroComprehensive Stroke Center, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Maria PlanasÀrea de Neurociènces, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet VilaDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Institut de Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Francesc Jiménez-AltayóDepartament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Institut de Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. francesc.jimenez@uab.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-2041
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017-SGR-645Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS PI13/0091Instituto de Salud Carlos III RETICS-INVICTUS-RD16/019Instituto de Salud Carlos III RIC RD12/0042/0006Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación SAF2014-56111-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for stroke and is associated with poorer post-stroke outcomes. The antioxidant uric acid is protective in experimental normotensive ischaemic stroke. However, it is unknown whether this treatment exerts long-term protection in hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the impact of transient intraluminal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (90 min)/reperfusion (1-15 days) on brain and vascular damage progression in adult male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY; n = 36) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR; n = 37) rats treated (i.v./120 min post-occlusion) with uric acid (16 mg kg

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsBrain InjuriesCerebral RevascularizationHypertensionInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleRatsRats, Inbred SHRRats, Inbred WKYTreatment OutcomeUric AcidVascular RemodelingAntioxidantsUric AcidAntioxidantHypertensionIschaemia-reperfusionIschaemic strokeOxidative stressVascular remodelling

Identifiers

PMID30219993
OpenAlexW2890351715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.