Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219367›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant and nonpregnant women.

Kimberly B Fortner, Geeta K Swamy, Karen R Broder, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, Yuwei Zhu, Pedro L Moro, Jennifer Liang, Emmanuel B Walter, R Phillips Heine, M Anthony Moody and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02209623 (Clinical Study of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02209623 completednot on this map

Clinical Study of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) Safety in Pregnant Women

TypeobservationalSponsorVanderbilt UniversityRan2014 to 2017Enrolled375ConditionsPertussisArmsTDAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Vaccination in pregnancy to protect the newborn.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Non-Viral RNA Delivery During Pregnancy: Opportunities and Challenges.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Safety and Clinical Benefits of AdacelInfectious diseases and therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Vaccination in Pregnancy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021
    Review
  19. ERRATA CORRIGE.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly B FortnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA. Electronic address: kfortner@utmck.edu.
Geeta K SwamyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Karen R BroderImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA.
Natalia Jimenez-TruqueDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yuwei ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pedro L MoroImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA.
Jennifer LiangDivision of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA.
Emmanuel B WalterDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
R Phillips HeineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
M Anthony MoodyDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sandra YoderDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kathryn M EdwardsDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Duke University · USVanderbilt University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertusiss (Tdap) vaccine is recommended during each pregnancy, regardless of prior receipt. Data on reactogenicity and immunogenicity, particularly after repeated Tdap, are limited. We compared local injection-site and systemic reactions and serologic response following Tdap in (1) pregnant and nonpregnant women and (2) pregnant women by self-reported prior Tdap receipt. STUDY

designPregnant women (gestational age 20-34 weeks) and nonpregnant women receiving Tdap were enrolled in this observational study. Injection-site and systemic reactions were assessed for one week post-vaccination. Pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, fimbriae, tetanus and diphtheria specific IgG antibody titers were determined by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and 28 days post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and serologic responses were compared by pregnancy status, and within pregnant women by self-reported prior Tdap receipt.

results374 pregnant and 225 nonpregnant women were vaccinated. Severe local or systemic reactions or "any" fever were uncommon (≤3% for both groups). Moderate/severe injection-site pain was significantly higher in pregnant (17.9%) versus nonpregnant (11.1%) women, but did not prompt a healthcare visit. Proportions of other moderate/severe or any severe reactions were not significantly higher in pregnant compared to nonpregnant women. Moderate/severe (including pain) and severe reactions were not significantly higher in pregnant women receiving repeat versus first-time Tdap. Antibody titers increased from baseline to post-vaccination for all vaccine antigens in pregnant and nonpregnant women; post-vaccination titers against pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin were significantly higher in nonpregnant versus pregnant women (p < 0.01).

conclusionTdap was well-tolerated in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Pregnant women were more likely to report moderate/severe pain at the Tdap injection-site compared with nonpregnant women, but did not necessitate medical visits. Prior Tdap receipt did not increase occurrence of moderate/severe local or systemic reactions in pregnant women. Serologic responses to all vaccine antigens were robust. Clinical Trial Registration@ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02209623. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02209623.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDiphtheria ToxoidFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesTetanusWhooping CoughYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDiphtheria ToxoidMaternal vaccinationTdap immunogenicityTdap reactogenicityTdap vaccineVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID30219367
PMCPMC6675450
OpenAlexW2891482108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.