Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219192›Full record

ReviewPET clinics2018

Applications of PET/CT and PET/MR Imaging in Primary Bone Malignancies.

Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi, Syed Imran Raza, John A Carrino, Christos Kosmas, Ali Gholamrezanezhad, Kyle Basques, George R Matcuk, Jay Patel, Hossein Jadvar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PET clinics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Primary malignant bone tumours-part 1].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of Total Body PET/CT in Inflammatory Disorders.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Bone tumors: state-of-the-art imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ashkan Heshmatzadeh BehzadiDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: ashkan.hbehzadi@gmail.com.
Syed Imran RazaDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
John A CarrinoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, 535 East 70th Street, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Christos KosmasDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Ali GholamrezanezhadDivision of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Kyle BasquesDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
George R MatcukDivision of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Jay PatelDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Hossein JadvarDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Cornell University · USUniversity of Southern California · USCase Western Reserve University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary bone malignancies are characterized with anatomic imaging. However, in recent years, there has been an increased interest in PET/computed tomography scanning and PET/MRI with fludeoxyglucose F 18 for evaluating and staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. These hybrid imaging modalities have shown promise largely owing to their high sensitivity, ability to perform more thorough staging, and ability to monitor treatment response. This article reviews the current role of PET/computed tomography scanning and PET/MRI in primary malignancies of bone, with an emphasis on imaging characteristics, clinical usefulness, and current limitations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone NeoplasmsChondrosarcomaFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Giant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansLymphomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMultiple MyelomaOsteosarcomaPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsPET/CTPET/MRIPrimary bone malignancies

Identifiers

PMID30219192
PMCPMC7466825
OpenAlexW2885790630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.