Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219103›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis.

Gherman V Uritskiy, Jocelyne DiRuggiero, James Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,225 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,225citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
49.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,225 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,530 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Immunoglobulin A protease fromGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gherman V UritskiyDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Jocelyne DiRuggieroDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. jdiruggiero@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-8061
James TaylorDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. james@taylorlab.org.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007231 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DOREN, MARK B · 1985 to 2020
$18.4M
Democratization of Data Analysis in Life Sciences Through GalaxyU41HG006620 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEKRUTENKO, ANTON, SCHATZ, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2020
$14.4M
Democratization of Data Analysis in Life Sciences Through GalaxyU24HG006620 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Daniel James Blankenberg, Jeremy Goecks · 2021 to 2026
$9.8M
Turning big data analysis infrastructure for HIV researchR01AI134384 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEKRUTENKO, ANTON, POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG006620NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006620NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134384NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of microbiomes using whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing enables the analysis of uncultivated microbial populations that may have important roles in their environments. Extracting individual draft genomes (bins) facilitates metagenomic analysis at the single genome level. Software and pipelines for such analysis have become diverse and sophisticated, resulting in a significant burden for biologists to access and use them. Furthermore, while bin extraction algorithms are rapidly improving, there is still a lack of tools for their evaluation and visualization.

resultsTo address these challenges, we present metaWRAP, a modular pipeline software for shotgun metagenomic data analysis. MetaWRAP deploys state-of-the-art software to handle metagenomic data processing starting from raw sequencing reads and ending in metagenomic bins and their analysis. MetaWRAP is flexible enough to give investigators control over the analysis, while still being easy-to-install and easy-to-use. It includes hybrid algorithms that leverage the strengths of a variety of software to extract and refine high-quality bins from metagenomic data through bin consolidation and reassembly. MetaWRAP's hybrid bin extraction algorithm outperforms individual binning approaches and other bin consolidation programs in both synthetic and real data sets. Finally, metaWRAP comes with numerous modules for the analysis of metagenomic bins, including taxonomy assignment, abundance estimation, functional annotation, and visualization.

conclusionsMetaWRAP is an easy-to-use modular pipeline that automates the core tasks in metagenomic analysis, while contributing significant improvements to the extraction and interpretation of high-quality metagenomic bins. The bin refinement and reassembly modules of metaWRAP consistently outperform other binning approaches. Each module of metaWRAP is also a standalone component, making it a flexible and versatile tool for tackling metagenomic shotgun sequencing data. MetaWRAP is open-source software available at https://github.com/bxlab/metaWRAP .

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSoftwareAlgorithmsBacteriaData AnalysisData MiningGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsBinBinningDraft genomeMetagenomeMetagenomicsPipelineReassemblyWGS

Identifiers

PMID30219103
PMCPMC6138922
OpenAlexW2950464960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.