Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219062›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2018

Efficacy of high zinc biofortified wheat in improvement of micronutrient status, and prevention of morbidity among preschool children and women - a double masked, randomized, controlled trial.

Sunil Sazawal, Usha Dhingra, Pratibha Dhingra, Arup Dutta, Saikat Deb, Jitendra Kumar, Prabhabati Devi, Ashish Prakash

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunil SazawalCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India. ssazawal@jhu.edu.
Usha DhingraCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Pratibha DhingraCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Arup DuttaCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Saikat DebCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Jitendra KumarCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Prabhabati DeviCenter for Public Health Kinetics, 214A, Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi, 110024, India.
Ashish PrakashDepartment of Pediatrics, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Subharti Medical College · IN

Funding

Harvest Plus 114666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofortification of staple food crops with zinc (Zn) can be one of the cost-effective and sustainable strategies to combat zinc deficiency and prevent morbidity among the target population. Agronomic approaches such as application of Zn fertilizers to soil and/or foliar spray seem to be a practical tool for Zn biofortification of wheat. However, there is a need to evaluate its efficacy from randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of zinc biofortified wheat flour on zinc status and its impact on morbidity among children aged 4-6 years and non-pregnant non lactating woman of child bearing age (WCBA) in Delhi, India.

methodsIn a community based, double-masked randomized controlled trial, 6005 participants (WCBA and child pairs) were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive either high zinc biofortified wheat flour (HZn, 30 ppm zinc daily) or low zinc biofortified wheat flour (LZn, 20 ppm zinc daily) for 6 months (WCBA @ 360 g/day and children @ 120 g/day). Baseline and endline blood samples were obtained for assessing hematological markers; zinc status and data on compliance and morbidity were collected.

resultsCompliance rates were high; ~ 88% of the WCBAs in both the groups consumed 50% or more of recommended amount of biofortfied wheat flour during the follow up. Similarly 86.9% children in HZn and 87.5% in LZn consumed 50% or more of recommended wheat flour intake. There was no significant difference in mean zinc levels between the groups at end study. This observation might be due to a marginal difference in zinc content (10 ppm) between the HZn and LZn wheat flour, and a short intervention period. However a positive impact of bio-fortification on self-reported morbidity was observed. Compared to children in LZn group, children in HZn group had 17% (95% CI: 6 to 31%, p = 0.05) and 40% (95% CI: 16 to 57%; p = 0.0019) reduction in days with pneumonia and vomiting respectively. WCBA in the HZn group also showed a statistically significant 9% fewer days with fever compared to LZn group.

conclusionsBiofortified wheat flour had a good compliance among children and WCBAs. Significant improvement on some of the self-reported morbidity indicators suggests that evaluating longer-term effects of biofortification with higher grain zinc content would be more appropriate.

trial registrationhttp://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/ , CTRI/2014/04/004527, Registered April 7, 2014.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedNutritional StatusAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMalnutritionMicronutrientsMiddle AgedTriticumYoung AdultMicronutrientsZincBiofortificationChildrenIndiaMorbidityPlasma zincWoman of child-bearing ageZinc

Identifiers

PMID30219062
PMCPMC6139156
OpenAlexW2890951294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.