Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30219059›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2018

Impact of nanoparticle surface functionalization on the protein corona and cellular adhesion, uptake and transport.

Ashraf Abdelkhaliq, Meike van der Zande, Ans Punt, Richard Helsdingen, Sjef Boeren, Jacques J M Vervoort, Ivonne M C M Rietjens, Hans Bouwmeester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Plastic Fly: WhatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashraf AbdelkhaliqRIKILT-Wageningen Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-9391
Meike van der ZandeRIKILT-Wageningen Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ans PuntRIKILT-Wageningen Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Richard HelsdingenRIKILT-Wageningen Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sjef BoerenLaboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, P.O. box 8128, 6700 ET, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jacques J M VervoortLaboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, P.O. box 8128, 6700 ET, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ivonne M C M RietjensDivision of Toxicology, Wageningen University, P.O. box 8000, 6700 EA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hans BouwmeesterRIKILT-Wageningen Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. hans.bouwmeester@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpon ingestion, nanoparticles can interact with the intestinal epithelial barrier potentially resulting in systemic uptake of nanoparticles. Nanoparticle properties have been described to influence the protein corona formation and subsequent cellular adhesion, uptake and transport. Here, we aimed to study the effects of nanoparticle size and surface chemistry on the protein corona formation and subsequent cellular adhesion, uptake and transport. Caco-2 intestinal cells, were exposed to negatively charged polystyrene nanoparticles (PSNPs) (50 and 200 nm), functionalized with sulfone or carboxyl groups, at nine nominal concentrations (15-250 μg/ml) for 10 up to 120 min. The protein coronas were analysed by LC-MS/MS.

resultsSubtle differences in the protein composition of the two PSNPs with different surface chemistry were noted. High-content imaging analysis demonstrated that sulfone PSNPs were associated with the cells to a significantly higher extent than the other PSNPs. The apparent cellular adhesion and uptake of 200 nm PSNPs was not significantly increased compared to 50 nm PSNPs with the same surface charge and chemistry. Surface chemistry outweighs the impact of size on the observed PSNP cellular associations. Also transport of the sulfone PSNPs through the monolayer of cells was significantly higher than that of carboxyl PSNPs.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the composition of the protein corona and the PSNP surface chemistry influences cellular adhesion, uptake and monolayer transport, which might be predictive of the intestinal transport potency of NPs.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCaco-2 CellsCell AdhesionCell SurvivalHumansIntestinal MucosaNanoparticlesParticle SizePolystyrenesProtein CoronaStatic ElectricitySurface PropertiesTandem Mass SpectrometryPolystyrenesProtein CoronaCellular adhesion and uptakeHigh throughput screeningLabel-free LC–MS/MSNanoparticlesQuantitative proteomics

Identifiers

PMID30219059
PMCPMC6138932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.