Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218790›Full record

ArticleBone2018

The limitations of using simple definitions of glucocorticoid exposure to predict fracture risk: A cohort study.

Danielle E Robinson, Tjeerd P van Staa, Elaine M Dennison, Cyrus Cooper, William G Dixon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Low-dose glucocorticoid increase the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a retrospective cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Atopic Eczema-Associated Fracture Risk and Oral Corticosteroids: A Population-Based Cohort Study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Danielle E RobinsonArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Tjeerd P van StaaHealth eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, M13 9PL, UK; Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elaine M DennisonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 5UG, UK; NIHR Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
William G DixonArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, M13 9PL, UK; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK. Electronic address: will.dixon@manchester.ac.uk.
Southampton General Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20380Department of Health 10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0902272Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MC_U147574212Medical Research Council MC_U147574234Medical Research Council MC_U147574237Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1Versus Arthritis 17702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effects of different definitions of glucocorticoid (GC) exposure on the magnitude and pattern of fracture risk using the same dataset.

methodsData from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a primary care database with electronic health records in the United Kingdom. Patients exposed to oral GCs were matched to up to two unexposed patients by age, gender and location. The first osteoporotic fracture was identified and adjusted and unadjusted cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) produced for fracture risk following GC therapy using different models of risk attribution. These include models demonstrating the effect of dose, duration and recency of GC exposure.

resultsThere were 16,507 patients included. Exposed patients were older and had more comorbidities. GC therapy was associated with an increased risk of fracture, with the effect size influenced by risk attribution model. The risk of fracture decreased with less recent exposure from HR (95% CI) 1.66 (1.27, 2.16) during the first month of stopping GCs to 1.11 (0.79, 1.57) for between 1 and 3 months. The risk of fracture increased with current daily dose, HR 1.44 (1.17, 1.77) for 5-9.9 mg prednisolone equivalent dose (PEQ) to 3.02 (1.77, 5.15) for 15-19.9 mg PEQ. Risk of fracture increased with cumulative dose, a function of dose and duration, from HR 1.22 (1.03, 1.44) for <1 g to 1.83 (1.35, 2.48) for 7.5-10 g.

conclusionGC exposure was associated with excess fracture risk, with effect size differing according to definition of exposure. This highlights the need to incorporate all exposure dimensions (dose, duration and recency) in these patient's fracture risk assessments.

Indexed as

Administration, OralCohort StudiesFemaleFractures, BoneGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalRisk FactorsGlucocorticoidsEpidemiologyExposure definitionsFractureGlucocorticoidsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30218790
PMCPMC6173307
OpenAlexW2889603795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.