ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2018
Spatial frequency domain imaging using an analytical model for separation of surface and volume scattering.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Impact of scattering phase function and polarization on the accuracy of diffuse and sub-diffuse spatial frequency domain imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Generic and Model-Based Calibration Method for Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging with Parameterized Frequency and Intensity Correction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Involvement of Photobiology in Contemporary Dentistry-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Modeling and Synthesis of Breast Cancer Optical Property Signatures With Generative Models.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Dual-DMD hyperspectral spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) using dispersed broadband illumination with a demonstration of blood stain spectral monitoring.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Single snapshot spatial frequency domain imaging for risk stratification of diabetes and diabetic foot.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- The MOVE-C Cervical Artificial Disc - Design, Materials, Mechanical Safety.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Hyperspectral imaging in the spatial frequency domain with a supercontinuum source.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Special Section Guest Editorial: Special Section on Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A method to correct for surface scattering in spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is presented. The use of a modified analytical solution of the radiative transfer equation allows calculation of the reflectance and the phase of a rough semi-infinite geometry so that both spatial frequency domain reflectance and phase can be applied for precise retrieval of the bulk optical properties and the surface scattering. For validation of the method, phantoms with different surface roughness were produced. Contrarily, with the modified theory, it was possible to dramatically reduce systematic errors due to surface scattering. The evaluation of these measurements with the state-of-the-art theory and measuring modality, i.e., using crossed linear polarizers, reveals large errors in the determined optical properties, depending on the surface roughness, of up to ≈100 % . These results were confirmed with SFDI measurements on a phantom that has a structured rough surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.