Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218461›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

Automatic localization of closely spaced cochlear implant electrode arrays in clinical CTs.

Yiyuan Zhao, Benoit M Dawant, Robert F Labadie, Jack H Noble

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simulation of apically grounded cochlear implant stimuli using neural stimulation models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Unified Deep-Learning-Based Framework for Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Localization.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using a Precurved Electrode Array Inserted With an External Sheath.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiyuan ZhaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Benoit M DawantDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Jack H NobleDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Model-based Cochlear Implant ProgrammingR01DC014037 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, JACK · 2014 to 2024
$5.0M
Computer-assisted, image-guided programming of Cochlear ImplantsR01DC014462 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014462NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC014462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCochlear implants (CIs) are neural prosthetic devices that provide a sense of sound to people who experience profound hearing loss. Recent research has indicated that there is a significant correlation between hearing outcomes and the intracochlear locations of the electrodes. We have developed an image-guided cochlear implant programming (IGCIP) system based on this correlation to assist audiologists with programming CI devices. One crucial step in our IGCIP system is the localization of CI electrodes in postimplantation CTs. Existing methods for this step are either not fully automated or not robust. When the CI electrodes are closely spaced, it is more difficult to identify individual electrodes because there is no intensity contrast between them in a clinical CT. The goal of this work is to automatically segment the closely spaced CI electrode arrays in postimplantation clinical CTs.

methodsThe proposed method involves firstly identifying a bounding box that contains the cochlea by using a reference CT. Then, the intensity image and the vesselness response of the VOI are used to segment the regions of interest (ROIs) that may contain the electrode arrays. For each ROI, we apply a voxel thinning method to generate the medial axis line. We exhaustively search through all the possible connections of medial axis lines. For each possible connection, we define CI array centerline candidates by selecting two points on the connected medial axis lines as the array endpoints. For each CI array centerline candidate, we use a cost function to evaluate its quality, and the one with the lowest cost is selected as the array centerline. Then, we fit an a priori known geometric model of the array to the centerline to localize the individual electrodes. The method was trained on 28 clinical CTs of CI recipients implanted with three models of closely spaced CI arrays. The localization results are compared with the ground truth localization results manually generated by an expert.

resultsA validation study was conducted on 129 clinical CTs of CI recipients implanted with three models of closely spaced arrays. Ninety-eight percent of the localization results generated by the proposed method had maximum localization errors lower than one voxel diagonal of the CTs. The mean localization error was 0.13 mm, which was close to the rater's consistency error (0.11 mm). The method also outperformed the existing automatic electrode localization methods in our validation study.

conclusionOur validation study shows that our method can localize closely spaced CI arrays with an accuracy close to what is achievable by an expert on clinical CTs. This represents a crucial step toward automating IGCIP and translating it from the laboratory to the clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsElectrodes, ImplantedAutomationHumanscenterline localizationcochlear implantelectrode arraysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID30218461
PMCPMC7185475
OpenAlexW2891206313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.