Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218438›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018

The Walking Wounded: Emerging Treatments for PTSD.

Durga Bestha, Layla Soliman, Kelly Blankenship, James Rachal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Durga BesthaDepartment of Psychiatry, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Layla SolimanDepartment of Psychiatry, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Kelly BlankenshipMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
James RachalDepartment of Psychiatry, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA. James.rachal@carolinashealthcare.org.
Atrium Medical Cente · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe review the published literature over the last 24 months in the treatment of PTSD for our military men and women. We examined the updated clinical practice guidelines published in June 2017 by the Veteran's administration and Department of Defense and contrasted the guidelines with the most recent literature. We also discuss new directions in PTSD research. RECENT

findingsPsychotherapy remains one of the most effective treatments for PTSD; unfortunately, few participants remain in treatment to completion. Many of the emerging therapies target NMDA receptor antagonists, cannabinoid receptor modulators, glucocorticoid receptor agonists, non-SSRI antidepressants, and opioid receptor agonists. The newer therapies fall into the drug classes of anti-hypertensives, glutamate modulators, oxytocin, and medication targeting insomnia/hyperarousal. PTSD symptoms are often chronic in our veteran population. While current treatments are helpful, there are often significant residual symptoms. We reviewed the most recent improvements in treatment and discuss therapies that are in the research phase.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsHumansMilitary PersonnelPsychotherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTreatment OutcomeVeteransAntidepressive AgentsEmerging pharmacotherapyGlutamate modulatorsNeuroactive steroidsPosttraumatic stress disorderPsychotherapySomatic therapies

Identifiers

PMID30218438
OpenAlexW2892009644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.