Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218402›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018

Employers' Perspectives on Accommodating and Retaining Employees with Newly Acquired Disabilities: An Exploratory Study.

Alix Gould-Werth, Katherine Morrison, Yonatan Ben-Shalom

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Continued Employability among People with Mental Illnesses: Development of a Scale in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. The Work Ability of People with Mental Illnesses: A Conceptual Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Job quality for Americans with disabilities.Journal of vocational rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alix Gould-WerthWashington Center for Equitable Growth, 1500 K Street NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.
Katherine MorrisonMathematica Policy Research, 1100 First Street NE, Floor 12, Washington, DC, 20002, USA. kmorrison@mathematica-mpr.com.
Yonatan Ben-ShalomMathematica Policy Research, 1100 First Street NE, Floor 12, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Mathematica Policy Research · USWashington Center for Equitable Growth · US

Funding

ACL HHS 9ORT5037-02-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Timely and appropriate accommodations can help employees who experience disabilities stay at work instead of exiting the labor force. Employers can play a critical role in connecting such workers with the accommodations they need. This qualitative study seeks to inform policy makers who want to improve workforce retention outcomes by uncovering factors that affect whether employers provide accommodations to, and ultimately retain, employees with disabilities. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of human resources professionals in 14 Arkansas-based employers, yielding detailed information on 50 cases in which an employee developed or disclosed a disability. We analyzed the interviews using a grounded theory approach and compared cases to identify key themes emerging across subgroups of cases. Results Two organization-level factors and four employee-level factors influenced employers' efforts to accommodate and retain employees with disabilities: employer resources; employers' communication with the employee and other stakeholders; employee tenure; employee work performance; active/sedentary nature of employee role; and the severity and type of employees' health conditions. Conclusions Consistent with prior literature, employers with greater access to resources and better ability to communicate generally made greater effort to accommodate and retain employees with disabilities. However, employers in the study did not deploy these resources and processes consistently when making decisions about whether and how to provide accommodations to workers with disabilities; employee-level characteristics affected their actions. Policy makers should consider intervention approaches that reach workers who may be overlooked by employers with scarce resources.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesChronic DiseaseCommunicationDisease ProgressionEmploymentHumansJob DescriptionMental DisordersOccupational HealthOrganizational PolicyQualitative ResearchReturn to WorkSeverity of Illness IndexWork PerformanceWorkplaceDisabilityQualitative researchWorkWork accommodationsWork retention

Identifiers

PMID30218402
OpenAlexW2890548682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.