Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218382›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Filippo Pesapane, Marcin Czarniecki, Matteo Basilio Suter, Baris Turkbey, Geert Villeirs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Dual-time-point dynamicAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Pharmacokinetic Study of Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles HY-088 in Rats.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploitation of CD133 for the Targeted Imaging of Lethal Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filippo PesapaneDepartment of Health Sciences, Postgraduation School of Radiodiagnostic of Milan, Milan, Italy. filippo.pesapane@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0374-5054
Marcin CzarnieckiMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Matteo Basilio SuterDepartment of Medical Oncology, ASST Sette laghi, Varese, Italy.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Geert VilleirsDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of distant metastases at the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) establishes the treatment approach and has a prognostic value, nevertheless it is not well established. Since proposed staging approaches often contradict each other, we aimed to compare the current imaging techniques for staging of advanced PCa, including future applications of the most innovative methods. Conventional imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) have been employed for metastatic staging (both N and M staging) of men with high-risk PCa, but surgical pelvic dissection remains the gold standard for N staging. However, functional MRI by using diffusion-weighted imaging, MR lymphography (MRL) with ultra-small paramagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO), and hybrid PET/MRI imaging showed both high sensitivity and high specificity for nodal staging and depicting metastases. The standard of practice for M staging in PCa includes the radionuclide bone scan and targeted X-ray film, but their performance has generally been poor. Recently, MRI showed promising results with applications in both local and distant staging. Finally, with the development of new PET tracers, PET/CT and PET/MRI offer a combination of excellent pharmacokinetic characteristics, functional information, and precise anatomic localization and morphological correlation of tumor lesions.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone metastasesHybrid imagingImaging stagingLymph node metastasesProstate cancer staging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.