Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218326›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2019

Incorporation of Collagen from Marine Sponges (Spongin) into Hydroxyapatite Samples: Characterization and In Vitro Biological Evaluation.

J R Parisi, K R Fernandes, I R Avanzi, B P Dorileo, A F Santana, A L Andrade, P R Gabbai-Armelin, C A Fortulan, E S Trichês, R N Granito and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unraveling the Potential ofBiomacromolecules · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J R ParisiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Washington Luís, km 235, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. juliaparisi@outlook.com.
K R FernandesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Washington Luís, km 235, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
I R AvanziDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
B P DorileoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
A F SantanaDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
A L AndradeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Washington Luís, km 235, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
P R Gabbai-ArmelinDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
C A FortulanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
E S TrichêsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
R N GranitoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
A C M RennoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterial-based bone grafts have an important role in the field of bone tissue engineering. One of the most promising classes of biomaterials is collagen, including the ones from marine biodiversity (in general, called spongin (SPG)). Also, hydroxyapatite (HA) has an important role in stimulating bone metabolism. Therefore, this work investigated the association of HA and SPG composites in order to evaluate their physico-chemical and morphological characteristics and their in vitro biological performance. For this, pre-set composite disks were evaluated by means of mass loss after incubation, pH, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and "in vitro" cell viability. pH measurements showed no statistical difference between groups. Moreover, a higher mass loss was observed for HA/SPG70/30 compared to the other groups for all experimental periods. Moreover, SEM representative micrographs showed the degradation of the samples with and without immersion. FTIR analysis demonstrated the absorption peaks for poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), HA, and SPG. A higher L292 cell viability for control and PMMA was observed compared to HA and HA/SPG 90/10. Also, HA/SPG 70/30 showed higher cell viability compared to HA and HA/SPG 90/10 on days 3 and 7 days of culture. Furthermore, HA showed a significant lower MC3T3 cell viability compared to control and HA/SPG 70/30 on day 3 and no significant difference was observed between the composites in the last experimental period. Based on our investigations, it can be concluded that the mentioned composites were successfully obtained, presenting improved biological properties, especially the one mimicking the composition of bone (with 70% of HA and 30% of SPG). Consequently, these data highlight the potential of the introduction of SPG into HA to improve the performance of the graft for bone regeneration applications. Further long-term studies should be carried out to provide additional information concerning the late stages of material degradation and bone healing in the presence of HA/SPG.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone SubstitutesCell LineCell SurvivalCollagenDurapatiteFibroblastsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMiceNIH 3T3 CellsPolymethyl MethacrylatePoriferaTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesCollagenDurapatitePolymethyl MethacrylateBiomedical applicationCollagenMarine biomaterialsMarine biotechnologyTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30218326
OpenAlexW2891748743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.